Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The case for case reports: avoiding statistical seduction.

A Robert Kagan1, Raoul J Burchette, Shawn Iganej

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern California Kaiser Permanente Medical Group, Los Angeles, CA, USA. robert.a.kagan@kp.org

American Journal of Clinical Oncology
|August 8, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ghost Cell Odontogenic Carcinoma: Case Series and Literature Review.

Head and neck pathology·2025
Same author

The Relationship Between Racial/Ethnic Concordance and Hypertension Control.

The Permanente journal·2022
Same author

The role of Ifosfamide-doxorubicin chemotherapy in histology-specific, high grade, locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma, a 14-year experience.

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology·2021
Same author

Prognostic impact of retropharyngeal lymphadenopathy in early-stage HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer: Implications for staging optimization.

Oral oncology·2021
Same author

Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in 390 Patients: Analysis of Clinical and Histological Criteria Which Significantly Impact Outcome.

Head and neck pathology·2019
Same author

Key Determinants of the Value of Random Cervical Biopsy at Colposcopy.

Journal of lower genital tract disease·2019
Same journal

Care Patterns and Gastric Cancer-Related Outcomes in Patients With Pathogenic/Likely Pathogenic Germline CDH1 Variants: A 14-Year Single-Center Analysis.

American journal of clinical oncology·2026
Same journal

Upper Extremity Lymphedema​​​: Performance of a Risk Prediction Model in Women Undergoing Surgery for Breast Cancer.

American journal of clinical oncology·2026
Same journal

Executive Summary of the American Radium Society (ARS) Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for the Use of Radiation in the Prevention and Treatment of Heterotopic Ossification (HO).

American journal of clinical oncology·2026
Same journal

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Combined With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Single-Arm Meta-Analysis Approach.

American journal of clinical oncology·2026
Same journal

Emergence of Single-Week Adjuvant Radiation Therapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer in the United States.

American journal of clinical oncology·2026
Same journal

Early Versus Delayed Pancreatic Enzyme Replacement Therapy After Pancreatic Cancer Surgery: A Real-World Cohort Study.

American journal of clinical oncology·2026
See all related articles

Cancer patient management highlights critical thinking and adaptability. It cautions against seeking a single "best" treatment, which can create intellectual rigidity and label alternative approaches as substandard.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Medical Ethics
  • Philosophy of Medicine

Background:

  • Effective cancer patient management requires logical reasoning and cognitive flexibility.
  • The pursuit of a singular optimal treatment can lead to intellectual inflexibility.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically examine the concept of a "gold standard" in cancer treatment.
  • To advocate for flexible and individualized patient management strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of established medical terminology.
  • Philosophical inquiry into the nature of medical evidence and practice.

Main Results:

  • The "gold standard" or "best practice" in cancer care can stifle innovation and individualization.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Over-reliance on standardized approaches may imply alternative methods are unethical.

    • Conclusions:

    • Embracing intellectual flexibility and questioning established norms is crucial in cancer care.
    • A nuanced approach, rather than a rigid "evidence-based medicine" (EBM) standard, better serves diverse patient needs.