Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Assessing waterborne risks: an introduction.

Gunther F Craun1, Rebecca L Calderon, Timothy J Wade

  • 1Gunther F. Craun & Associates, 101 West Frederick Street, Suite 207, Staunton, VA 24401, USA. gfcraun@verizon.net

Journal of Water and Health
|August 10, 2006
PubMed
Summary

This paper guides readers in evaluating epidemiologic studies on waterborne disease risks. Understanding study designs, limitations, and risk estimation methods is crucial for accurate interpretation.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Recent SARS-CoV-2 infections and increased antibody responses to viral antigens are associated with greater autoantibody reactivity.

Immunology letters·2026
Same author

Spreading the Word: Sharing EPA's COVID-19 Research Results.

EM plus·2025
Same author

Filling Critical Science Gaps: EPA Office of Research and Development's Response to COVID-19.

EM plus·2025
Same author

Pilot application of an inflammation and physiological dysregulation index based on noninvasive salivary biomarkers.

BMC research notes·2025
Same author

Greater residential greenness is associated with reduced epigenetic aging in adults.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Correction: Health risks to children from exposure to fecally-contaminated recreational water.

PloS one·2024

Area of Science:

  • Environmental epidemiology
  • Public health research

Background:

  • Epidemiologic studies are vital for assessing waterborne disease risks.
  • Readers may face challenges in understanding complex study designs and terminology.
  • Potential biases and limitations can affect the interpretation of results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide guidance for evaluating epidemiologic studies on waterborne disease risks.
  • To clarify the importance of understanding study designs, strengths, limitations, and biases.
  • To help readers interpret disease risk estimations accurately.

Main Methods:

  • Review of epidemiologic study designs relevant to waterborne diseases.
  • Analysis of common terminology and potential ambiguities in risk assessment.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Explanation of different approaches to calculating and interpreting attributable risk.

    • Main Results:

    • Readers need to critically assess the methodology of waterborne disease studies.
    • Understanding the nuances of risk estimation, such as attributable risk, is essential.
    • Awareness of potential biases and limitations improves result interpretation.

    Conclusions:

    • Effective evaluation of waterborne disease risk studies requires understanding epidemiologic principles.
    • Clear interpretation of risk estimates depends on recognizing methodological details and definitions.
    • This paper aims to enhance reader comprehension and critical appraisal skills in this field.