Electron self-exchange between Au140(+/0) nanoparticles is faster than that between Au38(+/0) in solid-state,...

The well-defined one-electron steps in the voltammetry of solutions of the nanoparticles Au38(SC2Ph)24 and Au140(SC6)53 (SC2Ph = phenylethanethiolate; SC6 = hexanethiolate) enable preparation of solutions containing, for example, Au38(SC2Ph)24 and Au38(SC2Ph)24+(ClO4)- nanoparticles in known relative proportions. From these solutions can be cast dry, mixed-valent films demonstrably containing the same proportions. Electronic conduction in such mixed-valent films is shown to occur by a bimolecular electron self-exchange reaction at a rate proportional to the concentration product, [Au38][Au38+]. The observed Au38(+/0) rate constant, approximately 2 x 10(6) M(-1) s(-1), is much smaller than that previously observed for Au140(+/0) films (ca. 4 x 10(9) M(-1) s(-1); Wuelfing, W. P.; et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 11465). To our knowledge, this is the first example of a significant size effect in metal nanoparticle electron-transfer dynamics. Thermal activation parameters for the electron-hopping conductivities of the two nanoparticles reveal that the rate difference is mainly caused by energy barriers (EA) for Au38(+/0) electron transfers that are larger by approximately 3-fold than those for Au140(+/0) electron transfers (ca. 20 vs 7 kJ/mol). Differences in pre-exponential terms in the activation equations for the two nanoparticles are a smaller contributor to the rate constant difference and can be partly ascribed to differences in tunneling distances.