Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Anogenital Distance and Perineal Measurements of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) Quantification System
Published on: September 20, 2018
Weak VLPP and MUCP correlation and their relationship with objective and subjective measures of severity of urinary
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Charles University, Apolinárská 18, 128 00, Prague 2, Czech Republic. martan@vfn.cz
The aims of the present study were to find the correlation between Valsalva leak-point pressure (VLPP) and cough leak-point pressure (CLPP) and to determine whether the water perfusion maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) correlates with VLPP. Seventy-nine women with previously untreated stress urinary incontinence were recruited to participate in a clinical study. Their mean age was 56.4 years, mean BMI was 27.8, and mean parity was 1.9. The mean values of VLPP and CLPP were 50.4 and 52.9 cm H(2)O, respectively. We did not find statistically significant differences in the mean values of VLPP and CLPP. The mean value of MUCP at rest was 44.2 cm H(2)O and the mean value of MUCP during maximal Valsalva maneuver was 37.2 cm H(2)O; with 500 ml of sterile saline in the bladder the difference between them is statistically significant. In the study group (n=79), 56 patients (77%) had low VLPP (< or =60 cm H(2)O), 21 patients (30%) had low MUCP (< or =30 cm H(2)O), and 8 patients had MUCP< or =20 cm H(2)O (all at rest). Of the 56 patients with low VLPP, 16 also had a low MUCP (< or =30 cm H(2)O). This study mainly compares two parameters-the MUCP and the VLPP. Based on our results we can conclude that there is no correlation between these parameters. MUCP measures urethral resistance at rest and VLPP measures urethral resistance during increased intra-abdominal pressure (Valsalva maneuver).
The aims of the present study were to find the correlation between Valsalva leak-point pressure (VLPP) and cough leak-point pressure (CLPP) and to determine whether the water perfusion maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) correlates with VLPP. Seventy-nine women with previously untreated stress urinary incontinence were recruited to participate in a clinical study. Their mean age was 56.4 years, mean BMI was 27.8, and mean parity was 1.9. The mean values of VLPP and CLPP were 50.4 and 52.9 cm H(2)O, respectively. We did not find statistically significant differences in the mean values of VLPP and CLPP. The mean value of MUCP at rest was 44.2 cm H(2)O and the mean value of MUCP during maximal Valsalva maneuver was 37.2 cm H(2)O; with 500 ml of sterile saline in the bladder the difference between them is statistically significant. In the study group (n=79), 56 patients (77%) had low VLPP (< or =60 cm H(2)O), 21 patients (30%) had low MUCP (< or =30 cm H(2)O), and 8 patients had MUCP< or =20 cm H(2)O (all at rest). Of the 56 patients with low VLPP, 16 also had a low MUCP (< or =30 cm H(2)O). This study mainly compares two parameters-the MUCP and the VLPP. Based on our results we can conclude that there is no correlation between these parameters. MUCP measures urethral resistance at rest and VLPP measures urethral resistance during increased intra-abdominal pressure (Valsalva maneuver).
Related Concept Videos
Urodynamic Studies: Uroflowmetry
Imaging Studies VI: Voiding Cystourethrography and Cystography
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
