Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dose uncertainty due to aperture effects in dynamic fields.

P D Higgins1, P Alaei

  • 1Department of Therapeutic Radiology-Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA. higgi010@umn.edu

Medical Physics
|August 11, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Accurate intensity modulated radiation therapy dosimetry requires understanding dynamic collimator scatter. Varian Eclipse underestimates dose for small targets, while Philips Pinnacle shows better accuracy due to differing algorithms.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

SU-E-T-272: Commissioning an Orthovoltage Unit Used for Radiobiology Research.

Medical physics·2017
Same author

SU-E-J-15: Calculating the Dose from KV Cone Beam CT Within and Outside the Treatment Volume Using a Treatment Planning System.

Medical physics·2017
Same author

SU-E-T-512: Evaluation of Treatment Planning Dose Calculation Accuracy at the Interface of Prosthetic Devices.

Medical physics·2017
Same author

SU-E-I-17: Characterization of Rotating Source MicroCT for Evaluating in Vivo Murine Trabecular Bone.

Medical physics·2017
Same author

Evaluation of surface and superficial dose for head and neck treatments using conventional or intensity-modulated techniques.

Physics in medicine and biology·2007
Same author

Evaluation of bladder dose in intensity-modulated radiation therapy of the prostate.

Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists·2006

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Radiotherapy Dosimetry

Background:

  • Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dosimetry relies on accurate modeling of beamlets.
  • Multileaf collimators (MLCs) dynamically shape radiation fields for precise dose delivery.
  • Accurate dosimetry for small fields is crucial for modern radiation therapy planning systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of aperture motion on scatter factors in IMRT.
  • To compare the accuracy of Varian Eclipse and Philips Pinnacle planning systems in accounting for collimator scatter.
  • To assess the dosimetric impact on small clinical targets during dynamic IMRT delivery.

Main Methods:

  • Measured dynamic collimator scatter (S(c)), total scatter (S(c,p)), and phantom scatter (S(p)) factors for various MLC settings and leaf gaps.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Compared dynamic scatter factors to static field factors using two Varian linear accelerators.
  • Evaluated dose distributions in small cylindrical targets using Varian Eclipse and Philips Pinnacle planning systems.

    • Main Results:

    • Dynamic collimator scatter factors (S(c)) showed systematic dependence on gap width and collimator setting, converging towards static values as gap increased.
    • No measurable difference was found between dynamic and static phantom scatter factors (S(p)).
    • Varian Eclipse underestimated dose for targets smaller than 1 cm, while Philips Pinnacle showed dose ratios close to unity.

    Conclusions:

    • Differences in dose calculation algorithms between planning systems significantly impact accuracy for small targets.
    • Accurate modeling of collimator scatter is essential for precise IMRT dosimetry, especially for small clinical targets.
    • Further investigation into planning system algorithms is needed to improve small field dosimetry.