Related Experiment Videos
C-reactive protein and cardiovascular disease: weighing the evidence
Gordon D O Lowe1, Mark B Pepys
1Centre for Amyloidosis and Acute Phase Proteins, Department of Medicine, University College London, Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 2PF, United Kingdom.
Insights
C-reactive protein (CRP) is likely not a useful predictor for cardiovascular events. Recent evidence suggests its association is weaker than believed and potentially due to other risk factors, not CRP itself.
Area of Science:
- Biochemistry
- Cardiology
- Genetics
Background:
- C-reactive protein (CRP) has been considered a significant predictor of cardiovascular events and metabolic syndrome.
- It was also thought to play a causal role in atherothrombosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To re-evaluate the predictive value of CRP for cardiovascular events and metabolic syndrome.
- To investigate the causal role of CRP in atherothrombosis.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of recent evidence regarding CRP's association with cardiovascular events.
- Examination of the relationship between CRP gene polymorphisms and cardiovascular outcomes.
- Review of in vitro studies on CRP's effects, considering potential contaminants.
Main Results:
- The association between CRP and cardiovascular events appears weaker than previously assumed.
- This association may be confounded by established cardiovascular risk factors.
- Noncoding CRP gene polymorphisms are not associated with coronary events or metabolic syndrome.
- Many claimed proatherothrombotic effects of CRP in vitro were due to contaminants in commercial preparations.
Conclusions:
- CRP is likely not a clinically useful predictor of cardiovascular events or metabolic syndrome.
- The evidence does not support a causal role for CRP in atherothrombosis.
- Future trials of CRP inhibitors may clarify CRP's role in cardiovascular disease pathogenesis.
Abstract:
C-reactive protein (CRP) has been widely promoted as a strong, independent predictor of cardiovascular events and metabolic syndrome, both in general populations and in patients with clinical cardiovascular disease, and as a causal player in atherothrombosis. However, recent evidence shows that the association of CRP with cardiovascular events is weaker than previously thought, that it may be largely attributed to confounding by established causal risk factors, and that CRP is, therefore, probably not a clinically useful risk predictor. The lack of association of noncoding CRP gene polymorphisms (which determine different baseline CRP values) with coronary events or metabolic syndrome does not support a causal role for CRP, and most of the putatively proatherothrombotic in vitro effects claimed for CRP were caused by contaminants in commercial CRP preparations and not by CRP. Future clinical trials of specific CRP inhibitors now in development could directly test the contribution of CRP to pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease.
Related Concept Videos
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Psychoneuroimmunology: Cardiovascular Disease
A key area of focus in PNI is the relationship between stress and coronary...
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Rheumatic Heart Disease I: Introduction