[Dental status, access to care and precariousness]

The oral status of people living in precarious conditions is problematic. Although the public universal health insurance should allow better access to care, access to dental care remains a critical issue. The analysis of the patient population of a hospital dental consultation (Groupe Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris) seemed relevant to evaluate the needs of care and the means to provide it. The principal objectives are: to estimate dental health and needs of this population, to describe their sociodemographic characteristics and to compare them with patients living in common social conditions.

A cross sectional study was conducted from February to June 2003. A medical questionnaire and a dental file record were used. All outpatients coming to the dental consultation, in need of conservative or prosthetic treatment, were included. We analysed the risk factors associated with poor dental health.

Three hundred and thirty three questionnaires were analysed: two third were men, 45% were foreigners. More than half of them benefited from a special social health insurance for disadvantaged people or didn't have any health insurance. The comparative analysis of this precarious group vs regular insured people showed significant differences for sociodemographic and oral characteristics. Namely, in the precarious group, a poor dental status was generally observed: more cavities (3.6 versus 2), more absent teeth not replaced (6.8 versus 3.5) and less treated teeth (1.9 versus 3.9)--p < 0.0001. Multivariate analysis showed that main risk factors of poor dental status were to be aged and to be a foreigner.

This study stresses the importance of the dental care needs in a context of poor insurance refunding for the costs of dental treatments and the lack of structures able to provide dental care for patients living in difficult social condition. These findings question the organization of the dental care system in France.