Related Experiment Videos
Three-dimensional vertebral motions produced by mechanical force spinal manipulation
Tony S Keller1, Christopher J Colloca, Robert J Moore
1Musculoskeletal Research Foundation, Florida Orthopaedic Institute, Temple Terrace, Fla., USA. keller@cem.uvm.edu
Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
|August 15, 2006
Summary
The Impulse adjusting instrument produced greater spinal motion responses compared to mechanical instruments like the CAT and Activator IV. Force-time characteristics of chiropractic adjusting instruments significantly affect spinal motion.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Spinal Manipulation
- Chiropractic Technology
Background:
- Chiropractic adjusting instruments are widely used for spinal manipulation.
- Understanding the biomechanical effects of these instruments is crucial for optimizing treatment.
- Previous research has not fully quantified the 3D motion responses generated by different chiropractic tools.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify and compare the 3-dimensional intersegmental motion responses produced by three common chiropractic adjusting instruments.
- To evaluate the influence of different force settings on spinal motion.
- To compare the performance of mechanical and electromechanical adjusting instruments.
Main Methods:
- Six adolescent Merino sheep were used to measure intersegmental motion.
- Triaxial accelerometers were attached to intraosseous pins on L1 and L2 spinous processes.
- Three instruments (Chiropractic Adjusting Tool, Activator Adjusting Instrument IV, Impulse Adjusting Instrument) delivered posteroanterior thrusts to T12 at varying force settings.
Main Results:
- Intersegmental motion responses were greatest along the axial axis, followed by posteroanterior and medial-lateral axes.
- The electromechanical Impulse instrument generated the most linear force increase and the greatest acceleration and displacement responses, especially at high force settings.
- Significantly greater motion responses were observed for Impulse compared to CAT and Activator IV at high force settings.
Conclusions:
- The Impulse instrument produced larger-magnitude, 3D intersegmental displacement and acceleration responses compared to mechanical instruments.
- The force-time characteristics of chiropractic adjusting instruments significantly influence spinal motion.
- Adjusting instruments can be tuned to deliver optimal force for spinal manipulation.