Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Flexible random-effects models using Bayesian semi-parametric models: applications to institutional comparisons.

D I Ohlssen1, L D Sharples, D J Spiegelhalter

  • 1MRC Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 2SR, UK. david.ohlssen@mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk

Statistics in Medicine
|August 15, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Frequentist rules for regulatory approval of subgroups in phase III trials: A fresh look at an old problem.

Statistical methods in medical research·2021
Same author

Anaesthetist contribution to mortality after cardiac surgery - a reply.

Anaesthesia·2016
Same author

The contribution of the anaesthetist to risk-adjusted mortality after cardiac surgery.

Anaesthesia·2015
Same author

Statistics. The future lies in uncertainty.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2014
Same author

The power of the MicroMort.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2014
Same author

Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of endobronchial and endoscopic ultrasound relative to surgical staging in potentially resectable lung cancer: results from the ASTER randomised controlled trial.

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2012
Same journal

Checking Genetic Homogeneity Between Two Samples Using Summary Statistics With Application to Mendelian Randomization.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Bayesian Learning Model for Joint Risk Prediction of Alcohol and Cannabis Use Disorders.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Reluctant Transfer Learning in Penalized Regressions for Individualized Treatment Rules Under Effect Heterogeneity.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Predictor-Assisted Nonparametric Graphical Models With Multivariate Error-Prone Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Optimizing Treatment Decision Estimation for Right-Censored Survival Data Through Parameter Transfer Learning.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Latent Class Log-Linear Models for Estimating Diagnostic Test Accuracy Without a Gold Standard: A Simulation Study.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a flexible random effects model using Bayesian non-parametrics for medical statistics. The model aids in comparing healthcare providers and detecting unusual performance clusters, enhancing data analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Statistics
  • Bayesian Non-parametrics
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Random effects models are crucial in medical statistics for meta-analysis, cluster randomized trials, and healthcare provider comparisons.
  • Traditional parametric approaches can mask issues like clusters of providers with unusual results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a tutorial on implementing a flexible random effects model using Bayesian non-parametric methods.
  • To apply this model to routine hospital performance data for provider comparisons.
  • To introduce a diagnostic tool for identifying unusual provider clusters.

Main Methods:

  • Implementation of a flexible random effects model based on Bayesian non-parametric methodology.
  • Application of the model using freely available software (WinBUGS code provided).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilizing routine performance data for hospital comparisons.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed model effectively handles comparisons of healthcare providers using routine data.
    • A diagnostic tool is provided to detect clusters of providers with unusual results.
    • This approach avoids the masking problems inherent in traditional parametric methods.

    Conclusions:

    • The flexible random effects model offers a valuable tool for applied statisticians in medical research.
    • The Bayesian non-parametric approach provides enhanced diagnostics for provider performance analysis.
    • Freely available software implementation facilitates broader adoption in various applications.