Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

External validity: the neglected dimension in evidence ranking.

Navindra Persaud1, Muhammad M Mamdani

  • 1University College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. nav.persaud@utoronto.ca

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
|August 16, 2006
PubMed
Summary

To ensure effective patient treatment, evidence must be both internally valid and externally valid. Rankings should equally weigh internal and external validity for accurate clinical decision-making.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Personality traits and the managerial capacity of community-based facilities providing HIV services to key populations in Kenya and Malawi.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Implications of relying on manufacturer patient support programs for access to high-cost specialty and biologic medicines: a critical qualitative study.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Japan essential medicine list and medicine supply issues: a cross-sectional study.

Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice·2026
Same author

Inclusion of non-prescription medicines in essential lists: a cross-sectional study.

The International journal of pharmacy practice·2026
Same author

Pharmaceutical governance system for costly drugs through human rights due diligence.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2025
Same author

A practical approach to measuring MPDSR implementation: findings from a cross-sectional assessment in regional referral hospitals in Uganda.

BMC pregnancy and childbirth·2025

Area of Science:

  • Clinical research methodology
  • Evidence-based medicine

Background:

  • Clinical decisions require evidence that is both accurate (internally valid) and relevant (externally valid).
  • Current evidence rankings prioritize internal validity, often overlooking external validity.
  • Conflicting study results necessitate robust evidence appraisal for optimal patient care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To advocate for a balanced approach in evidence ranking, equally considering internal and external validity.
  • To highlight the importance of external validity in applying study findings to real-world clinical practice.
  • To underscore the potential risks of relying solely on internally valid evidence.

Main Methods:

  • Proposed a revised framework for evidence ranking.
  • Defined external validity components: study population, institution types, physician expertise, clinician decision-making, and patient preferences.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized spironolactone in heart failure as a case study to illustrate the limitations of internal validity alone.

    • Main Results:

    • Internal validity alone can be insufficient for guiding clinical treatment decisions.
    • External validity is crucial for ensuring that study findings are applicable to diverse patient populations and clinical settings.
    • A lack of external validity can lead to suboptimal or even harmful treatment choices.

    Conclusions:

    • Evidence rankings must equally incorporate both internal and external validity for reliable clinical decision-making.
    • Treatments should only be implemented when supported by evidence demonstrating both internal and external validity.
    • Integrating external validity into evidence appraisal enhances the applicability and effectiveness of medical treatments in practice.