Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Do bacteria need to be regulated?

P Silley1

  • 1MB Consult Limited and School of Life Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK. p-s@mbconsult.co.uk

Journal of Applied Microbiology
|August 16, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prudent use and regulatory guidelines for veterinary antibiotics-politics or science?

Journal of applied microbiology·2017
Same author

Workshop report: the 2012 antimicrobial agents in veterinary medicine: exploring the consequences of antimicrobial drug use: a 3-D approach.

Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics·2014
Same author

Susceptibility testing methods, resistance and breakpoints: what do these terms really mean?

Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics)·2012
Same author

Surveillance and monitoring of antimicrobial resistance and antibiotic consumption in humans and animals.

Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics)·2012
Same author

Susceptibility of coagulase-negative staphylococci to a kanamycin and cefalexin combination.

Journal of dairy science·2012
Same author

Fluoroquinolone resistance of Escherichia coli and Salmonella from healthy livestock and poultry in the EU.

Journal of applied microbiology·2011
Same journal

Investigating the antimicrobial efficacy of two aerosolised hydrogen peroxide fumigation cycles for biological safety cabinet decontamination.

Journal of applied microbiology·2026
Same journal

Phytochemical profile and anticryptococcal activity of a phenolic-rich fraction from the bark of Myracrodruon urundeuva M. Allemão.

Journal of applied microbiology·2026
Same journal

Streptococcus thermophilus 1131 and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus 2038 induce immune responses via M cell-mediated transcytosis in an in vitro human gut model.

Journal of applied microbiology·2026
Same journal

The oral phageome in human health, disease, and clinical implications.

Journal of applied microbiology·2026
Same journal

Lactiplantibacillus plantarum LSC3 attenuates anaphylactic response in a murine model of food allergy.

Journal of applied microbiology·2026
Same journal

Isolation, Genomic Analysis, and Evaluation of the Novel Lytic Phage vB_Cf_HW01: Potent Antibiofilm Activity and Therapeutic Efficacy Against a Clinical Isolate of Citrobacter freundii.

Journal of applied microbiology·2026
See all related articles

This review examines the microbiological data requirements for microbial feed additives, using Calsporin (Bacillus subtilis C-3102) as an example. It highlights the European regulatory framework for ensuring animal and human health.

Area of Science:

  • Animal Nutrition
  • Microbiology
  • Food Safety Regulations

Background:

  • Microbial feed additives are regulated under European Union Regulation (EC) No. 1831/2003.
  • This paper focuses on the microbiological aspects of these additives, exemplified by Calsporin, a product containing Bacillus subtilis C-3102.
  • Calsporin is designed to enhance animal production and performance by modulating gut flora.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline the microbiological data necessary for regulatory approval of microbial feed additives in Europe.
  • To use Calsporin as a case study to illustrate the regulatory data requirements.
  • To discuss the evolving scientific opinion within the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) FEEDAP Panel.

Main Methods:

  • Review of regulatory guidelines for microbial feed additives.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of data requirements for products like Calsporin.
  • Examination of the European regulatory framework for feed additives.

    • Main Results:

    • The European regulatory system requires specific microbiological data for feed additive approval.
    • The EFSA FEEDAP Panel's approach aligns with scientific advancements.
    • Current regulations provide robust protection for human health and the environment.

    Conclusions:

    • The regulation of bacteria in animal feed is essential for safety.
    • The European regulatory process for microbial feed additives is comprehensive.
    • Adequate data submission is crucial for the approval of products like Calsporin.