Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Assessment of the Medicare quality improvement organization program
William Rollow1, Terry R Lied, Paul McGann
1Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850, USA. william.rollow@cms.hhs.gov
Background:
Studies have shown improvement in quality of health care in the United States. However, the factors responsible for this improvement are largely unknown.
Objective:
To evaluate the effect of the Medicare Quality Improvement Organization (QIO) Program in 4 clinical settings by using performance data for 41 quality measures during the 7th Scope of Work.
Design:
Observational study in which differences in quality measures were compared between baseline and remeasurement periods for providers that received different levels of QIO interventions.
Setting:
Nursing homes, home health agencies, hospitals, and physician offices in the 50 U.S. states, the District of Columbia, and 2 U.S. territories.
Participants:
Providers receiving focused QIO assistance related to quality measures and providers receiving general informational assistance from QIOs.
Measurements:
5 nursing home quality measures, 11 home health measures, 21 hospital measures, and 4 physician office measures.
Results:
For nursing home, home health, and physician office measures, providers recruited specifically by QIOs for receipt of assistance showed greater improvement in performance on 18 of 20 measures than did providers who were not recruited; similar improvement was seen on the other 2 measures. Nursing homes and home health agencies improved more in all measures on which they chose to work with the QIO than in other measures. Nineteen of 21 hospital measures showed improvement; in this setting, QIOs were contracted for improvement initiatives solely at the statewide level. Overall, improvement was seen in 34 of 41 measures from baseline to remeasurement in the 7th Scope of Work.
Limitations:
As in any observational study, selection bias, regression to the mean, and secular trends may have influenced the results.
Conclusions:
These findings are consistent with an impact of the QIO Program and QIO technical assistance on the observed improvement. Future evaluations of the QIO Program will attempt to better address the limitations of the design of this study.
Related Concept Videos
01:30Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
01:26Methods of Documentation II: POMR
01:29Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
01:29Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
01:26Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is limited...
01:11Purpose of Health Records I
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes: