Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Is the Cardiff Acuity Test effective in detecting refractive errors in children?

Claire Howard1, Alison Y Firth

  • 1Salford Primary Care Trust, Department of Orthoptics, Salford, UK. claire.howard@salford-pct.nhs.uk

Optometry and Vision Science : Official Publication of the American Academy of Optometry
|August 16, 2006
PubMed
Summary

The Cardiff Acuity Test (CAT) may underdiagnose refractive errors in young children. The Bailey-Lovie Chart (BLC) is more effective for detecting reduced visual acuity in this population.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development of an easy-read version of the Brain Injury associated Visual Impairment - Impact Questionnaire (BIVI-IQ).

Clinical rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Assessing working musicians' perspectives of need and barriers regarding lay harm reduction efforts for substance-related harm in South Carolina.

Harm reduction journal·2026
Same author

A randomized controlled trial of Scanning Eye trAining as a Rehabilitation Choice for Hemianopia after stroke (SEARCH).

International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society·2025
Same author

UK exceptional case driving application outcomes in post-stroke homonymous hemianopia: results from a clinical study.

Disability and rehabilitation·2022
Same author

Measurement of Saccade Parameters in Relation to Adaptation to Homonymous Hemianopia.

The British and Irish orthoptic journal·2022
Same author

The Impact of Visual Impairment on Completion of Cognitive Screening Assessments: A Post-Hoc Analysis from the IVIS Study.

The British and Irish orthoptic journal·2022

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Pediatric Optometry

Background:

  • Refractive error is a primary cause of decreased visual acuity in young children, necessitating early detection to prevent amblyopia and educational delays.
  • The Bailey-Lovie Chart (BLC), a standard logarithmic minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) chart, is often too complex for very young children.
  • The Cardiff Acuity Test (CAT) is commonly used for preschool visual acuity screening due to its non-symbolic nature.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of the Cardiff Acuity Test (CAT) in identifying reduced visual acuity attributable to refractive errors in young children.
  • To compare the diagnostic performance of the CAT with the Bailey-Lovie Chart (BLC) for refractive error detection.

Main Methods:

  • A crossover study design was employed, testing the right eye visual acuity of 68 children (mean age 74 months) with known refractive errors.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Children were randomized to undergo testing with either the CAT or BLC first.
  • A pass criterion of 0.2 logMAR or better was used for both tests.
  • Main Results:

    • The CAT identified reduced visual acuity in only 25% of children with refractive errors, compared to 97% detected by the BLC.
    • Adjusting the CAT's threshold to 0.0 logMAR, as used clinically, improved its detection rate to 56% but still lagged behind the BLC.
    • The BLC demonstrated a significantly higher detection rate for refractive errors.

    Conclusions:

    • Current clinical practice relying solely on the Cardiff Acuity Test (CAT) may lead to underdiagnosis of reduced visual acuity caused by refractive errors in young children.
    • The findings question the adequacy of the CAT as a standalone screening tool for refractive errors in pediatric populations.
    • Further research may be needed to refine screening protocols for young children with potential refractive errors.