Related Experiment Videos
Sigmoid colon vaginoplasty in children
S Ekinci1, I Karnak, A O Ciftci
1Department of Paediatric Surgery, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Summary
Sigmoid colon vaginoplasty offers a successful method for vaginal construction in adolescents with various congenital conditions. This technique provides adequate length and self-moistening properties, with good cosmetic outcomes and minimal need for routine dilatation.
Area of Science:
- Surgical Reconstruction
- Pediatric Surgery
- Gynecology
Background:
- Vaginal construction is essential for patients with Mullerian duct aplasia, testicular feminization, and androgen insensitivity syndromes.
- Several methods for vaginal construction exist, with sigmoid colon vaginoplasty being a notable technique.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the surgical technique and outcomes of sigmoid colon vaginoplasty in adolescent patients.
- To assess the efficacy and suitability of sigmoid colon neovagina for congenital vaginal anomalies.
Main Methods:
- Six adolescent patients (mean age 16) with 5alpha-reductase deficiency, testicular feminization, or vaginal atresia underwent sigmoid vaginoplasty.
- A 15-20 cm segment of sigmoid colon was used, creating a retrovesical tunnel and anastomosis to the vaginal plate or rudimentary vagina.
- Postoperative care included daily vaginal irrigation; examination and calibration under anesthesia were performed without routine dilatation.
Main Results:
- Five of six patients experienced an uneventful recovery with excellent cosmetic results and appropriate vaginal length.
- One patient developed late introitus stenosis, successfully treated with dilatations.
- A single patient with vaginal atresia (Bardet-Biedl syndrome) suffered severe complications including deep vein thrombosis, renal failure, and sepsis, leading to death.
Conclusions:
- Sigmoid colon vaginoplasty is a suitable procedure for constructing a neovagina in children, offering adequate length, diameter, and self-moistening capabilities.
- The technique results in less perineal scarring and adaptability to existing structures, reducing the need for routine dilatation.
- While generally safe, potential morbidities include those associated with laparotomy and serious complications from underlying conditions.