Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Objectives for multiple-species conservation planning.

Emily Nicholson1, Hugh P Possingham

  • 1The Ecology Centre, School of Integrative Biology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia. e.nicholson@uq.edu.au

Conservation Biology : the Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
|August 17, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Uncovering correlates of decline and critical refuges for a threatened terrestrial mammal.

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2026
Same author

How monitoring matters for nature conservation: 15 reasons framed in a theory of change.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Multiple-use spatial planning for sustainable development and conservation.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2025
Same author

Neuron-specific enolase as a Biomarker in Nerve Compression and Cauda Equina Syndrome (BioNCCES) Study.

Emergency medicine journal : EMJ·2025
Same author

Applying the IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology to classify, describe, and map ecosystems based on regional data and Indigenous knowledge.

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2025
Same author

The estimated cost of preventing extinction and progressing recovery for Australia's priority threatened species.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same journal

Insights from three decades of IUCN Red List assessments catalyzing shark, ray, and chimaera conservation.

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2026
Same journal

Extreme site fidelity in long-distance migratory shorebirds in Australia and potential implications for conservation.

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2026
Same journal

Debate, pluralism, and power in epistemological violence: Reply to Simpson et al. (2026).

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2026
Same journal

When everything is violence, nothing is violence: Response to Koot et al. (2020).

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2026
Same journal

Key agroecosystems for the conservation of amphibians and reptiles in Europe.

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2026
Same journal

What climate adaptation can learn from evolutionary adaptation.

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2026
See all related articles

Defining conservation objectives using species extinction risk is crucial for effective biodiversity planning. Carefully selecting objective functions ensures better decision-making to maximize species viability and minimize extinction threats.

Area of Science:

  • Conservation Biology
  • Decision Theory
  • Ecology

Background:

  • Conservation planning requires clear objectives, but broad goals like maximizing biodiversity are often too vague for practical application.
  • Assessing extinction risk for single species is common, yet combining these risks into a single objective function for multiple species remains a challenge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To translate the general goal of maximizing species viability into explicit, quantifiable objectives for decision-theoretic conservation planning.
  • To formulate and compare different objective functions based on the extinction risk of multiple species.

Main Methods:

  • Developed several objective functions representing different conservation approaches and threat levels.
  • Illustrated differences between objective functions using simple examples, focusing on joint extinction probabilities and expected extinctions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzed the impact of correlations in extinction probabilities on decision-making.

    • Main Results:

    • Objective functions based on joint extinction probabilities can be misleading if extinction correlations are unknown.
    • Additive objectives, such as minimizing the expected number of extinctions, avoid these anomalies.
    • Different objective functions can lead to contrasting rankings of conservation management options.

    Conclusions:

    • The selection of an objective function is a critical determinant in conservation decision-making.
    • Decision-makers must carefully consider and define their conservation goals to ensure effective planning and resource allocation.
    • Explicitly formulating objectives based on multi-species extinction risk enhances the utility of decision-theoretic approaches in conservation.