Related Experiment Videos
Optimizing assurance: the risk regulation system in relationships.
Sandra L Murray1, John G Holmes, Nancy L Collins
1Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260-4110, USA. smurray@buffalo.edu
Psychological Bulletin
|August 17, 2006
Summary
This study introduces a risk regulation model explaining how relationship confidence enables individuals to pursue closeness despite fear of rejection. This balance is crucial for relationship well-being.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Social Psychology
- Relationship Science
Background:
- Romantic relationships involve balancing the desire for closeness with the fear of rejection.
- Understanding how individuals manage these competing goals is vital for relationship well-being.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose a risk regulation model explaining the balance between seeking closeness and avoiding rejection in romantic relationships.
- To elucidate the role of perceived partner regard in managing relationship risks.
Main Methods:
- Development of a theoretical model of risk regulation.
- Description of three interconnected "if--then" contingency rules (cognitive, affective, behavioral).
- Analysis of how general perceptions of partner regard influence these rules in risky situations.
Main Results:
- Confidence in a partner's positive regard facilitates the pursuit of dependence and connectedness.
- Perceived partner regard shapes the sensitivity of "if--then" rules in relationship contexts.
- These situated rules impact relationship well-being.
Conclusions:
- The proposed risk regulation model offers a framework for understanding relationship dynamics.
- The model integrates cognitive, affective, and behavioral components of risk management.
- Future research directions include empirical testing and integration with other theories.