Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Auditory image movement in evoked potentials.

J A Altman1, S F Vaitulevich

  • 1I.P. Pavlov Institute of Physiology, Academy of Sciences of the U.S.S.R., Leningrad.

Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
|April 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Objective and subjective indexes of auditory motion processing].

Fiziologiia cheloveka·2015
Same author

[Perceptual categories for auditory motion as reflected in mismatch negativity].

Fiziologiia cheloveka·2013
Same author

Discrimination of auditory motion patterns: the mismatch negativity study.

Neuropsychologia·2012
Same author

[Event-related potentials of human brain in spatial hearing].

Uspekhi fiziologicheskikh nauk·2012
Same author

[Forecast ability of the auditory system during perception of gradually or abruptly moving short sound images].

Zhurnal vysshei nervnoi deiatelnosti imeni I P Pavlova·2011
Same author

[Auditory perception sluggishness during short moving sound image localization].

Fiziologiia cheloveka·2010
Same journal

Coming to terms with brain waves.

Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology·2014
Same journal

Habituation of lower leg stretch responses in Parkinson's disease.

Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology·2000
Same journal

Asymmetry of cortical excitability revealed by transcranial stimulation in a patient with focal motor epilepsy and cortical myoclonus.

Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology·2000
Same journal

Evoked isometric muscle contractions in myopathies: analysis of pathophysiological properties by different stimulus patterns.

Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology·2000
Same journal

Task-related coherence and task-related spectral power changes during sequential finger movements.

Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology·2000
Same journal

Electrophysiological studies in mild idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome.

Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology·2000
See all related articles

This study investigated auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) using moving and stationary sound images. Moving auditory images enhanced AEP amplitude and altered binaural masking level differences, particularly in women.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Psychoacoustics

Background:

  • Long-latency auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) reflect central auditory processing.
  • Interaural time delays (delta Ts) can create the perception of moving auditory images.
  • Understanding AEPs' response to dynamic auditory stimuli is crucial for auditory perception research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effects of moving versus unmoved fused auditory images on AEPs.
  • To examine the influence of click rate on AEP amplitude.
  • To measure the binaural masking level difference (BMLD) for both moving and unmoved auditory images.

Main Methods:

  • Binaural stimulation with click trains and gradually changing interaural time delays (delta Ts) was used.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Auditory evoked potentials (AEPs), specifically the N1-P2 complex, were recorded.
  • Binaural masking level difference (BMLD) was calculated for moving and unmoved fused auditory images (FIs).

    • Main Results:

    • AEP N1-P2 complex amplitude increased with click rates above 15 Hz, more so for moving FIs.
    • BMLD for unmoved FIs was 6 dB.
    • Moving FIs showed significantly different BMLDs between sexes and hemispheres, with women exhibiting larger values.

    Conclusions:

    • Moving auditory images modulate AEPs differently than stationary ones.
    • Sex differences exist in the binaural processing of moving auditory stimuli.
    • AEPs provide insights into the neural correlates of auditory motion perception.