Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Implementation determinants, strategies and outcomes for scale-up of hospital-at-home: a systematic review.

Implementation science communications·2026
Same author

Scoping Review of Global Kidney Genetics Clinic Models and Outcomes.

Kidney international reports·2026
Same author

Developing implementation strategies for a community-based digital weight management program: A hybrid deductive-inductive thematic analysis grounded in implementation theory.

International journal of nursing sciences·2026
Same author

Psychoeducation for adults with type 1 diabetes and problematic hypoglycemia: implementation analysis of a clinical trial (HARPdoc).

Frontiers in health services·2026
Same author

Perioperative patient safety: nurses' safety perceptions and observed compliance with safety standards in the operating room.

BMC nursing·2026
Same author

Feasibility of neonatal intravenous nutrition for the management of gastroschisis in sub-Saharan Africa.

World journal of pediatric surgery·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 18, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Predicting preferences: a neglected aspect of shared decision-making.

Nick Sevdalis1, Nigel Harvey

  • 1Clinical Safety Research Unit, Department of Bio-Surgery & Surgical Technology, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK. n.sevdalis@imperial.ac.uk

Health Expectations : an International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy
|August 17, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Patients often mispredict their future preferences, impacting shared decision-making in healthcare. This review links behavioral science on preference prediction errors to improve patient-doctor treatment choices.

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 18, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Decision-making science
  • Behavioral economics
  • Health psychology

Background:

  • Shared decision-making (SDM) is a priority in patient-doctor treatment choices.
  • Existing SDM literature focuses on patient preferences but lacks integration with behavioral science on preference prediction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To bridge the gap between SDM and behavioral research on self-prediction of future preferences.
  • To review psychological factors influencing inaccurate future preference predictions.
  • To propose empirical questions for enhancing SDM.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of behavioral research on preference prediction.
  • Analysis of psychological theories explaining prediction errors.
  • Synthesis of findings to inform SDM practices.

Main Results:

  • Behavioral research indicates individuals frequently mispredict their future preferences and feelings.
  • Psychological biases and heuristics contribute to these mispredictions.
  • Understanding these mispredictions is crucial for effective SDM.

Conclusions:

  • Integrating insights from behavioral science can significantly improve SDM.
  • Addressing systematic errors in preference prediction can enhance patient-doctor communication.
  • Further research is needed to refine SDM procedures based on these findings.