Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Selecting patients for discussion of the ICD as primary prevention for sudden death in heart failure
Lynne Warner Stevenson1, Akshay S Desai
1Advanced Heart Disease Section, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Insights
Deciding on an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for heart failure patients involves weighing benefits against risks. For every 100 patients, an ICD may save 7-8 lives over 5 years, despite potential shocks.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Clinical Decision-Making
Background:
- Symptomatic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction increases sudden cardiac death risk.
- Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are used for primary prevention of sudden death.
- Recent trial data informs clinical decisions regarding ICD implantation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide practical guidance on implanting ICDs for primary prevention in heart failure.
- To distill recent trial experience for clinical application.
- To aid clinicians in patient selection and communication regarding ICDs.
Main Methods:
- Review and synthesis of recent clinical trial data on ICDs in heart failure.
- Focus on patient selection criteria: LVEF < 30-35% and 1-year survival prognosis.
- Framing patient communication around a 5-year outlook.
Main Results:
- For every 100 patients treated, 7-8 lives are predicted to be saved by ICDs over 5 years.
- Approximately 30 patients are predicted to die within 5 years, irrespective of ICD use.
- Consideration of adverse events like unnecessary shocks and device deactivation.
Conclusions:
- ICD implantation for primary prevention in selected heart failure patients offers significant survival benefits.
- Informed patient selection and clear communication about risks and benefits are crucial.
- The decision-making process should include the possibility of device deactivation for natural death.
Abstract:
This clinical perspective addresses the practical aspects of the decision to implant an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for primary prevention of sudden death in patients with symptomatic heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, based on a distillation of recent trial experience. Potentially eligible patients are selected on the basis of left ventricular ejection fraction < 30% to 35% and anticipated survival with good functional capacity beyond 1 year. Communication with these patients focuses on a horizon of 5 years, during which for every 100 patients receiving devices, approximately 30 patients are predicted to die with or without an ICD, while 7 to 8 lives may be saved with the ICD. These estimates are presented in the context of adverse events, including unnecessary shocks, and the possibility that circumstances may arise for which the defibrillator may be inactivated to allow natural death.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies