Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Investigating the Pathogenesis of MYH7 Mutation Gly823Glu in Familial Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy using a Mouse Model
Published on: August 8, 2022
Clinical characteristics of 304 kindreds evaluated for familial dilated cardiomyopathy
Jessica D Kushner1, Deirdre Nauman, Donna Burgess
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239, USA.
Insights
Familial dilated cardiomyopathy (FDC) and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC) share similar clinical features. Diagnosis of FDC cannot be solely based on clinical presentation, highlighting the need for genetic evaluation.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Genetics
- Internal Medicine
Background:
- Familial dilated cardiomyopathy (FDC) is defined as dilated cardiomyopathy of unknown cause in closely related family members.
- Distinguishing FDC from idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC) is crucial for genetic counseling and family screening.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate clinical characteristics differentiating FDC from IDC.
- To assess the diagnostic utility of clinical features in identifying FDC.
Main Methods:
- Reviewed medical records and family histories of 304 families with suspected FDC.
- Categorized pedigrees into confirmed FDC, probable FDC, possible FDC, and sporadic IDC.
- Analyzed clinical features, disease progression, and outcomes across categories.
Main Results:
- Clinical features, age of onset, and disease duration were similar across confirmed FDC, probable FDC, possible FDC, and IDC categories.
- Left ventricular dimensions increased and function worsened along the spectrum from confirmed FDC to IDC.
- A higher proportion of IDC patients required heart transplantation.
Conclusions:
- Clinical presentation alone is insufficient to diagnose FDC.
- Similarities between FDC and IDC underscore the importance of genetic assessment in suspected familial cases.
Background:
Familial dilated cardiomyopathy (FDC) is dilated cardiomyopathy of unknown cause occurring in 2 or more closely related family members.
Methods And Results:
Members of 304 families suspected to have FDC were evaluated by family history (FH) and medical record review and were categorized as affected with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC), unaffected, unknown, or no data. Pedigrees were categorized with confirmed FDC, probable FDC, possible FDC or IDC based on strength of evidence. Of the 304 pedigrees, 125 were categorized as confirmed FDC, 48 were probable FDC, 72 were possible FDC, and 59 had sporadic, nonfamilial IDC. Numbers of living first- and second-degree family members, and median number of relatives available for FH was greatest with confirmed FDC, and diminished for probable and possible FDC, and IDC categories. LV dimensions increased and LV function worsened in index patients along the spectrum from confirmed FDC, probable FDC, possible FDC and IDC, and a greater proportion of IDC patients underwent heart transplant. However, the age of onset, duration of disease, the time to death or heart transplant, and most other findings were similar among the 4 categories.
Conclusion:
Clinical characteristics of IDC and FDC are similar, precluding an FDC diagnosis from clinical features only.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Pedigree Analysis
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests

