Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

06:41
In Vivo Functional Study of Disease-associated Rare Human Variants Using Drosophila
Published on: August 20, 2019
Phenotypes and genotypes in 2 DGI families with different DSPP mutations
Yaling Song1, Changning Wang, Bin Peng
1Key Laboratory for Oral Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Summary
Dentinogenesis Imperfecta type II (DGI-II) linked to DSPP gene mutations shows distinct ultrastructural changes. Specific DSPP mutations can cause varied clinical phenotypes in affected families.
Area of Science:
- Genetics
- Biochemistry
- Dental Science
Background:
- Dentinogenesis Imperfecta type II (DGI-II) is a genetic disorder affecting dentin formation.
- Mutations in the Dentin Sialophosphoprotein (DSPP) gene are implicated in DGI-II.
- Understanding genotype-phenotype correlations is crucial for diagnosis and management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize dentin ultrastructure resulting from DSPP gene mutations.
- To define phenotypes associated with specific DSPP mutations in DGI-II families.
Main Methods:
- Phenotypic and genotypic analysis of two DGI-II families.
- DSPP exon amplification and sequencing for mutation identification.
- Scanning and transmission electron microscopy for dentin ultrastructure examination.
Main Results:
- Affected individuals exhibited teeth discoloration, attrition, and obliterated pulp chambers.
- A nonsense mutation (c.133CT) in DSPP was identified in family 1, associated with "shell" teeth.
- A missense mutation (c.52GT) in DSPP was identified in family 2.
- Ultrastructural analysis revealed irregular dentin tubules, abnormal enamel, and fibril bundles in family 1.
Conclusions:
- A nonsense mutation in DSPP causes characteristic tooth ultrastructural changes.
- DSPP mutations c.133CT and c.52GT may be mutation hotspots.
- Identical DSPP mutations can lead to diverse clinical phenotypes in unrelated DGI families.
Related Concept Videos
Pedigree Analysis
Overview
Incomplete Dominance
Gregor Mendel's work (1822 - 1884) was primarily focused on pea plants. Through his initial experiments, he determined that every gene in a diploid cell has two variants called alleles inherited from each parent. He suggested that amongst these two alleles, one allele is dominant in character and the other recessive. The combination of alleles determines the phenotype of a gene in an organism.
Dihybrid Crosses
Overview
Genetic Lingo
Overview
Trihybrid Crosses
Trihybrid Crosses
Some of Mendel’s crosses examined three pairs of contrasting characteristics. Such a cross is called a trihybrid cross. A trihybrid cross is a combination of three individual monohybrid crosses. For example, plant height (tall vs. short), seed shape (round vs. wrinkled), and seed color (yellow vs. green).
The F1 generation plants of a trihybrid cross are heterozygous for all three traits and produce eight gametes. Upon self-fertilization, these gametes have an equal chance to...
Some of Mendel’s crosses examined three pairs of contrasting characteristics. Such a cross is called a trihybrid cross. A trihybrid cross is a combination of three individual monohybrid crosses. For example, plant height (tall vs. short), seed shape (round vs. wrinkled), and seed color (yellow vs. green).
The F1 generation plants of a trihybrid cross are heterozygous for all three traits and produce eight gametes. Upon self-fertilization, these gametes have an equal chance to...
Law of Segregation
When crossing pea plants, Mendel noticed that one of the parental traits would sometimes disappear in the first generation of offspring, called the F1 generation, and could reappear in the next generation (F2). He concluded that one of the traits must be dominant over the other, thereby causing masking of one trait in the F1 generation. When he crossed the F1 plants, he found that 75% of the offspring in the F2 generation had the dominant phenotype, while 25% had the recessive phenotype.
