Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Coronary Artery Revascularization
Published on: September 15, 2023
Choice of hemodynamic support during coronary artery bypass surgery for prevention of stroke
Yasuyuki Shimada1, Hitoshi Yaku, Fumio Yamamoto
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Yuri-Kumiai General Hospital, Akita, Japan. Yasuyuki.Shimada@ma8.seikyou.ne.jp
Insights
This study developed a cerebrovascular accident (CVA) risk evaluation protocol. Implementing this protocol significantly reduced major CVA incidence in elective coronary surgery patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Neurology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) carries a risk of cerebrovascular accident (CVA).
- Pre-operative risk assessment and tailored hemodynamic support are crucial for preventing perioperative CVA.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate a protocol for cerebrovascular accident (CVA) risk assessment and hemodynamic support selection.
- To determine if the protocol reduces major CVA incidence during elective coronary surgery.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 92 patients (group A) before protocol implementation and 91 patients (group B) after.
- Utilized head CT, MRI, MRA, chest CT, carotid Doppler, carotid MRA, and ascending aorta echo for risk evaluation.
- Hemodynamic support (arrest on pump, on-pump beating, off-pump) was selected based on risk assessment.
Main Results:
- Major CVA incidence (modified Rankin scale 3-5) decreased from 6.6% in group A to 0% in group B (p < .05).
- Urgent surgery cases (group C, n=9) without protocol adherence had 3 major CVA events (p < .05 vs. group B).
- The protocol effectively eliminated major CVA in elective coronary surgery.
Conclusions:
- The implemented protocol significantly reduces major CVA in elective coronary surgery.
- Tailored hemodynamic support based on comprehensive CVA risk evaluation is effective.
- A simplified risk evaluation is needed for urgent surgical cases.
Abstract:
The objective of this study was to evaluate a protocol involving cerebrovascular accident (CVA) risk evaluation and choose adequate hemodynamic support that prevents major CVA. For evaluation of CVA risk, we undertook head computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), chest CT, carotid artery Doppler echo, carotid artery MRA, and echo scanning of ascending aorta during surgery. Cerebrovascular specialists did the physical examinations and reading of images. Hemodynamic support (chemical arrest on pump, on-pump beating, or off pump) was chosen according to the result of risk evaluation. We retrospectively studied 92 cases before (group A; 1997 October to 1998 November) and 91 after (group B; 1998 November to 2001 January) starting protocol. We also studied urgent cases (group C; 9 cases; 1997 October to 2001 January) in which we did not use the protocol. When adequate hemodynamic support was chosen, major CVA (modified Rankin scale grades 3, 4, and 5) incidence decreased from 6.6% (six case; group A) to 0% (p < .05; group B). There were three major CVA cases in group C (p < .05 vs. group B), in which the ascending aorta was clamped. Our protocol eliminated major CVA associated with elective coronary surgery. We need simpler evaluation, however, when we undertake urgent surgery.
More Related Videos
09:12Surgical Swine Model of Chronic Cardiac Ischemia Treated by Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Published on: March 27, 2018
12:00Evaluation of a Novel Laser-assisted Coronary Anastomotic Connector - the Trinity Clip - in a Porcine Off-pump Bypass Model
Published on: November 24, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Mate Choice
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures