Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Antigen-Capture Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Specific Detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae
Published on: February 24, 2023
Importance of clinical features in diagnosis of mumps during a community outbreak
C Cunningham1, C Faherty, M Cormican
1Turloughmore Health Centre, Athenry, Co Galway. ccunninghamdoc@yahoo.co.uk
Abstract:
Eleven patients with classical clinical features of mumps presented to one practice over a three month period. Initial laboratory testing for mumps virus specific IgM was positive in only two of the eleven cases. On subsequent testing by an additional system, four additional cases were IgM positive. Five were IgM negative by both assays. Some currently used serological tests for diagnosis of mumps virus infection may be negative in a high proportion of patients with clinically apparent mumps. This series illustrates that the time during the acute illness at which testing is performed may be important and that isolated serological tests cannot be relied upon to exclude a clinical diagnosis of mumps.
Insights
Diagnosing mumps can be challenging, as initial IgM tests may be negative in many clinically apparent cases. Relying solely on serology may lead to missed mumps diagnoses, highlighting the importance of clinical evaluation.
Area of Science:
- Virology
- Immunology
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Mumps is a contagious viral illness characterized by fever and parotitis.
- Accurate laboratory diagnostics are crucial for confirming mumps virus infection and managing outbreaks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic utility of serological tests for mumps virus infection in patients with classical clinical symptoms.
- To assess the impact of testing timing and assay type on mumps diagnosis.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective case series of eleven patients presenting with clinical mumps.
- Initial and subsequent testing for mumps virus-specific IgM using two different laboratory systems.
Main Results:
- Only 2 of 11 patients initially tested positive for mumps virus-specific IgM.
- An additional 4 cases became IgM positive upon subsequent testing with a different assay.
- Five patients remained IgM negative across both testing methods despite clear clinical presentation.
Conclusions:
- Current serological tests for mumps may yield false-negative results in a significant proportion of clinically diagnosed cases.
- The timing of sample collection during acute illness is critical for accurate IgM detection.
- Isolated serological results should not solely exclude a clinical diagnosis of mumps; clinical judgment remains paramount.
Related Concept Videos
Investigation of Disease Outbreaks
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Atypical Pneumonia
Myocarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Asthma III: Clinical Manifestations
Viral Meningitis