Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026

A Novel Surgical Approach for Intratracheal Administration of Bioactive Agents in a Fetal Mouse Model
Published on: October 31, 2012
Urinary excretion of darbepoetin after intravenous vs subcutaneous administration to preterm neonates
T L Warwood1, R K Ohls, D K Lambert
1Intermountain Healthcare, Neonatology Clinical Research Group, McKay-Dee Hospital, 4401 Harrison Boulevard, Ogden, UT 84403, USA.
Insights
Subcutaneous (s.c.) and intravenous (i.v.) darbepoetin dosing in preterm neonates showed similar erythropoietic response. Minimal urinary drug loss was observed with both s.c. and i.v. administration, suggesting i.v. darbepoetin is a viable option.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal Medicine
- Pharmacology
- Hematology
Background:
- Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents like darbepoetin are used in preterm neonates.
- Previous studies suggested subcutaneous (s.c.) darbepoetin may be more effective than intravenous (i.v.) administration.
- A theory proposed higher i.v. doses lead to urinary drug loss, but this lacked systematic testing.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and urinary loss of s.c. versus i.v. darbepoetin in preterm neonates.
- To investigate the theory of increased urinary darbepoetin loss with i.v. administration.
Main Methods:
- A pilot study involving preterm neonates (gestation <=32 weeks, weight <=1500 g, hemoglobin <=10.5 g/dl).
- Darbepoetin (4 microg/kg) was administered either i.v. or s.c. based on i.v. line availability.
- Urine samples were collected for 48 hours post-dose; blood samples were analyzed for reticulocyte counts (IRF, ARC, %) before and 96 hours after dosing.
Main Results:
- Ten neonates received either i.v. (n=5) or s.c. (n=5) darbepoetin with no adverse effects.
- Both i.v. and s.c. darbepoetin significantly increased reticulocyte counts (IRF, ARC, %) with no difference in magnitude between groups.
- Essentially no darbepoetin was detected in urine after i.v. dosing; minimal loss (<0.13% of dose) was observed in three neonates after s.c. dosing.
Conclusions:
- Urinary loss of darbepoetin was negligible for both i.v. and s.c. administration routes in preterm neonates.
- Both dosing methods yielded comparable reticulocyte responses 96 hours post-administration.
- Intravenous darbepoetin administration is a practical and effective option, potentially reducing discomfort compared to s.c. injections.
Objective:
Previous studies suggest that darbepoetin might stimulate erythropoiesis in preterm neonates more effectively if injected subcutaneously (s.c.) than if infused intravenously (i.v.). It has been postulated that this is because very high plasma concentrations after i.v. dosing result in urinary loss of the drug. However, this theory has not been tested systematically, and no direct comparisons have been made between s.c. and i.v. dosing of darbepoetin in preterm neonates.
Study Design:
Preterm neonates were eligible for this pilot study if they were born at < or =32 weeks gestation with a weight of < or =1500 g, and had a hemoglobin < or =10.5 g/dl. The darbepoetin was given (4 microg/kg) i.v., over 4 h, if an i.v. was already in place and s.c. if no i.v. was in place. Urine was collected for drug quantification before dosing and for 48 h after. Blood was obtained for immature reticulocyte fraction (IRF), absolute reticulocyte count (ARC) and reticulocyte % before and 96 h after dosing.
Results:
Ten preterm neonates were studied: five received i.v. and five received s.c. darbepoetin. No adverse effects of the administrations were detected. IRF, ARC and reticulocyte % increased in the i.v. and s.c. recipients, and no difference in magnitude of increase was apparent between the groups. Before the darbepoetin was administered, none of the patients had any erythropoietin (Epo) detected in their urine. After i.v. dosing, no darbepoetin was detected in any of the samples, on any of the subjects, over the subsequent 48 h. After s.c. dosing, three of the patients had minimal urinary Epo detected. The patient with the largest urinary loss of drug had only 0.13% of the administered dose detected in the urine. Thus, essentially no urinary loss of drug was observed following either i.v. or s.c. darbepoetin dosing.
Conclusion:
Darbepoetin loss into the urine was below detectable limits among seven patients, while three had minimally detectable urinary losses. i.v. and s.c. dosing resulted in approximately equivalent increases in reticulocyte response when measured 96 h after dosing. On this basis, we speculate that if a patient who is to receive darbepoetin has an i.v. in place, the drug can be given i.v., thus avoiding any discomfort associated with an s.c. injection.
Related Concept Videos
Renal Drug Clearance: Comparison Between Renal Excretion Methods
Renal clearance is often associated with the renal glomerular filtration rate (GFR), which represents the rate at which plasma is filtered through the glomeruli in the kidney. When drug reabsorption is minimal and there is no active secretion, renal clearance is closely related to the...
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion

