Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A comment on phylogenetic correction.

F James Rohlf1

  • 1Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York 11794-5245, USA. rohlf@life.bio.sunysb.edu

Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution
|August 26, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Too Many Numbers?

Systematic biology·2025
Same author

Author Response: The Posterior Displacement of the Bruch's Membrane Opening: A Surprising Finding in Spaceflight-Associated Neuro-Ocular Syndrome.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2023
Same author

Ocular Deformations in Spaceflight-Associated Neuro-Ocular Syndrome and Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2023
Same author

Efficacy of diffeomorphic surface matching and 3D geometric morphometrics for taxonomic discrimination of Early Pleistocene hominin mandibular molars.

Journal of human evolution·2019
Same author

THE KLUGE-KERFOOT PHENOMENON-A STATISTICAL ARTIFACT.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2017
Same author

THE ACCURACY OF PHYLOGENETIC ESTIMATION USING THE NEIGHBOR-JOINING METHOD.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2017
Same journal

The role of microbial resource mutualists in plant adaptation to abiotic environments.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2026
Same journal

Museum genomics links MC1R alleles to adaptive winter coat color polymorphism in the long-tailed weasel.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2026
Same journal

Repeated evolution of iridescence and hindwing tails is associated with morphometric flight proxies in skipper butterflies.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2026
Same journal

Temperature-dependent competition predicts contrasting outcomes of adjacent secondary contact zones in darters (Percidae:Etheostoma).

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2026
Same journal

Sex allocation of hermaphrodites in metapopulations with frequent population extinction and recolonization.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2026
Same journal

The phylogenetic signal of extinction through the rise and fall of early vertebrates: field of bullets or clustered strike?

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2026
See all related articles

Phylogenetic statistical methods reduce variance in trait correlations and regressions, not remove artifacts. Estimates remain unbiased, contrary to common interpretation, with minor correlation bias.

Area of Science:

  • Comparative biology
  • Phylogenetic comparative methods
  • Statistical modeling in biology

Background:

  • Phylogenetic relatedness influences trait correlations and regressions.
  • Common statistical methods aim to correct for phylogenetic artifacts.
  • These methods are often misinterpreted as removing phylogenetic effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To accurately interpret the effects of phylogenetic statistical methods.
  • To clarify how phylogeny influences regression and correlation coefficients.
  • To address common misconceptions about phylogenetic correction.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of statistical methods for phylogenetic comparative data.
  • Examination of the impact of phylogeny on regression and correlation coefficients.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Theoretical evaluation of bias and variance in parameter estimates.

    • Main Results:

    • Phylogenetic methods reduce the variance of regression and correlation coefficients.
    • Regression coefficient estimates are unbiased regardless of phylogenetic correction.
    • Correlation estimates show minimal bias, often in an unexpected direction.

    Conclusions:

    • Correct interpretation involves variance reduction, not artifact removal.
    • Phylogenetic methods provide more precise, not necessarily smaller, estimates.
    • Understanding these effects is crucial for accurate biological interpretations.