Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dermal filler agents: a practical review.

Sukhjit S Johl1, Richard A Burgett

  • 1Oculofacial Surgery, Department of Ophthalmology, The Permanente Medical Group, Inc., Sacramento, California 95815, USA. sukhjit.s.johl@kp.org

Current Opinion in Ophthalmology
|August 26, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Facial aging involves changes that can be difficult to treat with traditional methods. Dermal fillers offer a non-surgical way to restore volume and improve facial contours. This review summarizes the available fillers, focusing on their composition, handling, and outcomes. Each filler has unique properties that affect how it is used and how long it lasts. The authors suggest that clinicians should choose fillers based on patient-specific needs and product characteristics. Understanding these differences is key to achieving safe and effective results.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Primary intraosseous cavernous hemangioma of the zygomatic bone.

American journal of ophthalmology case reports·2026
Same author

Anterior vestibule salvaging technique to limit silicone orbital implant extrusion following evisceration.

Orbit (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2018
Same author

Giant cell arteritis presenting with uveitis.

Ocular immunology and inflammation·2013
Same author

Computed Tomography Exophthalmometry.

Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging : the official journal of the International Society for Imaging in the Eye·2010
Same author

Computed Tomography Exophthalmometry.

Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging : the official journal of the International Society for Imaging in the Eye·2010
Same author

Spheno-orbital Reconstruction after Meningioma Resection.

Skull base : official journal of North American Skull Base Society ... [et al.]·2009

Area of Science:

  • Dermatologic surgery outcomes research within cosmetic medicine
  • Soft-tissue augmentation techniques in facial aesthetics

Background:

Facial aging involves complex histopathologic and anatomic changes that challenge cosmetic interventions. While traditional approaches like skincare and surgery address many aging signs, they often fall short in correcting soft-tissue defects. Prior research has shown that these defects may arise from age-related volume loss, scarring, or disease. It was already known that dermal fillers provide a non-surgical alternative for volume restoration. However, the diversity of available filler types and their distinct properties remain poorly understood in clinical practice. This gap motivated a need to clarify the composition, handling, and outcomes of each filler. No prior work had resolved the comparative limitations and optimal uses of different agents. Understanding these differences is essential for selecting the right product for each patient’s needs.

Purpose Of The Study:

This review aims to clarify the characteristics of currently available dermal fillers for soft-tissue augmentation. The specific problem is the lack of comprehensive guidance on filler selection due to their varied compositions and effects. The motivation stems from the need to improve patient outcomes through informed product choice. The authors propose to synthesize existing literature and manufacturer data to guide clinicians. This approach allows for a structured evaluation of each filler’s benefits and risks. By focusing on FDA-approved agents, the review ensures clinical relevance. The goal is to enhance physician knowledge of filler properties to optimize treatment planning. This synthesis supports safer and more effective cosmetic interventions.

Keywords:
Facial aestheticsCosmetic dermatologySoft-tissue fillersFDA-approved agents

Frequently Asked Questions

Dermal fillers address soft-tissue defects caused by aging, scarring, or disease by restoring volume and contour.

Hyaluronic acid fillers typically last six to twelve months, while calcium-based agents may persist longer and provide denser augmentation.

Each filler’s composition affects its longevity, injectability, and suitability for specific facial regions.

Manufacturer data provides insights into handling requirements and potential complications for each product.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The authors conducted a literature review and analyzed manufacturer data for FDA-approved dermal fillers. They focused on agents currently available for soft-tissue augmentation in facial aesthetics. Each filler’s composition, handling requirements, and therapeutic outcomes were systematically evaluated. The review approach included comparing the physical and chemical properties of each product. The authors also assessed potential complications and limitations associated with each filler. No experimental data was generated; instead, the synthesis relied on existing clinical and technical reports. The review approach ensured a comprehensive overview of available options. This method allowed for a structured comparison of products based on their clinical performance.

Main Results:

The review identified multiple dermal fillers with distinct compositions and effects. Some agents are based on hyaluronic acid, while others use calcium hydroxylapatite or poly-L-lactic acid. The study found that each filler’s longevity and injectability vary significantly. For example, hyaluronic acid fillers may last six to twelve months, while calcium-based agents can persist longer. The authors reported that some fillers may cause transient swelling or bruising post-treatment. They also noted that certain agents may not be suitable for deep tissue augmentation. The findings suggest that product selection should align with the patient’s anatomical needs. These results highlight the importance of understanding each filler’s properties before treatment.

Conclusions:

The authors conclude that dermal fillers offer a valuable option for managing facial aging signs. They propose that the wide range of available products requires clinicians to understand each agent’s properties. The synthesis suggests that proper handling and product selection are key to achieving desired outcomes. The authors emphasize that no single filler is universally ideal for all patients. They suggest that clinicians should consider a filler’s composition and longevity when planning treatment. The review approach supports the need for ongoing education on filler characteristics. The authors propose that future clinical decisions should be guided by product-specific evidence. These conclusions align with the goal of improving patient care through informed filler use.

Transient swelling and bruising are commonly reported post-treatment effects.

The authors suggest that clinicians should tailor filler selection to individual patient needs based on product properties.