Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Do student-defined learning issues increase quality and quantity of individual study?

Peter P J L Verkoeijen1, Remy M J P Rikers, Wilco W R te Winkel

  • 1Department of Psychology, Higher Education Research Center, Erasmus University Rotterdam, PO Box 1738, NL-3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. verkoeijen@fsw.eur.nl

Advances in Health Sciences Education : Theory and Practice
|August 26, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Artificial intelligence in peer review: beyond the distinction between assistance and substitution.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
Same author

Disclosure is not enough: Rethinking the epistemic implications of AI in academic writing.

Medical teacher·2026
Same author

What is a medical expert? A reply to Kapur (2024).

Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany)·2026
Same author

Teaching and learning clinical reasoning skill in undergraduate medical students: A scoping review.

PloS one·2024
Same author

Learning mechanisms and outcomes of an interprofessional molecular pathology workshop for residents.

Academic pathology·2022
Same author

Relationship quality in higher education and the interplay with student engagement and loyalty.

The British journal of educational psychology·2021
Same journal

Decision-making in programmatic assessment is only a challenge when we make it one.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2026
Same journal

Historicizing health professions education research: history as a strategic analytic resource.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2026
Same journal

Factors influencing workplace collaboration and learning between resident doctors and senior nurses: a scoping review.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2026
Same journal

Grave lessons: a guide to historiographical research in health professions education.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2026
Same journal

A scoping review of inquiry in medicine and nursing using Dewey's perspective.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2026
Same journal

"Teaching is important, but it's not important": a qualitative study of teacher identity among early-career academics in health professions.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2026
See all related articles

Goal-free problems in problem-based learning encourage more extensive individual study. Students in goal-free scenarios read more, studied longer, and reported more literature than those with specified learning goals.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Pedagogy

Background:

  • Problem-based learning (PBL) is a key educational approach.
  • The structure of problem scenarios can influence student engagement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of goal-free problem scenarios on student study habits.
  • To compare individual study quantity and quality between goal-free and goal-specified PBL conditions.

Main Methods:

  • An experiment was conducted within a problem-based learning course.
  • Tutorial groups were divided into two conditions: goal-specified and goal-free problem scenarios.
  • Student study behaviors, including article reading and time spent studying, were measured.

Main Results:

  • Students in the goal-free condition read significantly more articles.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Participants in the goal-free condition dedicated more time to studying and reporting literature.
  • The goal-free approach led to increased individual study time and extensiveness.

    • Conclusions:

    • Goal-free problem scenarios positively influence the quantity and depth of individual student study in PBL.
    • This approach enhances student engagement with learning materials.
    • Educators can leverage goal-free problems to foster more comprehensive self-directed learning.