Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Environmental context influences visually perceived distance.

Joseph S Lappin1, Amy L Shelton, John J Rieser

  • 1Vanderbilt Vision Research Center, Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, 301 Wilson Hall, Nashville, TN 37203, USA. joe.lappin@vanderbilt.edu

Perception & Psychophysics
|August 29, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Temporal processes of information transmission from visual search to behavior.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

Form and Function in Information for Visual Perception.

i-Perception·2022
Same author

Contemporary developments inspired by the research of Charles W. Eriksen.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2021
Same author

Correction to: A Limiting Channel Capacity of Visual Perception: Spreading Attention Divides the Rates of Perceptual Processes.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2020
Same author

Concepts About the Causes of Development: Travel, Visual Experience, and the Development of Dynamic Spatial Orientation.

Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies·2020
Same author

Framework for advancing rigorous research.

eLife·2020
Same journal

Response organization in selective adaptation to speech sounds.

Perception & psychophysics·2014
Same journal

Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Simple and contingent adaptation effects for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory property detectors and processing place features in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities.

Perception & psychophysics·2008
See all related articles

Perceived distances in natural settings are unexpectedly influenced by the surrounding visual field. Environmental context significantly impacts both accuracy and precision in judging egocentric distances.

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Environmental psychology
  • Spatial cognition

Background:

  • Understanding how humans perceive space is crucial for various fields, including architecture, virtual reality, and navigation.
  • Previous research has explored factors influencing distance perception, but the impact of specific environmental contexts remains incompletely understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how the surrounding visual field influences the perception of egocentric distances in natural settings.
  • To determine if environmental context affects both the accuracy and precision of perceived distances.

Main Methods:

  • Participants bisected egocentric distances in three distinct environments: a lobby, a hallway, and an open lawn.
  • A second experiment utilized the method of constant stimuli to replicate and confirm the initial findings.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Perceived midpoints were consistently overestimated (antifore-shortening), contrary to the typical foreshortening effect.
  • The magnitude of this antifore-shortening error varied significantly with the environment, being greatest in enclosed spaces (lobby, hall) and minimal on the open lawn.
  • Distance discrimination variability was also context-dependent, with greater variability observed in the hallway compared to the lobby or lawn.

Conclusions:

  • The accuracy and precision of visually perceived egocentric distances are not absolute but are dynamically modulated by the surrounding visual environment.
  • Environmental context plays a critical role in shaping spatial perception, influencing how we estimate distances to familiar objects.
  • These findings highlight the complex interplay between visual cues and cognitive processes in constructing our perception of space.