Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparing view sensitivity in shape discrimination with shape sensitivity in view discrimination.

Rebecca Lawson1, Heinrich H Bülthoff

  • 1School of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, England. rlawson@liverpool.ac.uk

Perception & Psychophysics
|August 29, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Draft Genome Assembly of Root Knot Nematode, <i>Meloidogyne fallax</i>.

Journal of nematology·2025
Same author

Effects of Dietary Protein to Lipid Ratio and Insect Meal on Growth Performance, Feed Utilization, and the Gut Microbiome of Lake Whitefish (<i>Coregonus clupeaformis</i>).

Aquaculture nutrition·2025
Same author

Towards a Customizable, SLA 3D-Printed Biliary Stent: Optimizing a Commercially Available Resin and Predicting Stent Behavior with Accurate In Silico Testing.

Polymers·2024
Same author

General lighting can overcome accidental viewing.

i-Perception·2024
Same author

A systematic review of the measures that have been used to assess surface characteristics in relation to their impact on walking and falling.

Systematic reviews·2023
Same author

Dietary protein, lipid and insect meal on growth, plasma biochemistry and hepatic immune expression of lake whitefish (<i>Coregonus clupeaformis</i>).

Fish and shellfish immunology reports·2023
Same journal

Response organization in selective adaptation to speech sounds.

Perception & psychophysics·2014
Same journal

Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Simple and contingent adaptation effects for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory property detectors and processing place features in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities.

Perception & psychophysics·2008
See all related articles

Human observers can distinguish between shape and view changes, but task-irrelevant changes still impact performance. Performance is better when focusing on the relevant visual dimension, indicating moderate success in ignoring distractions.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • Understanding how humans process object recognition involves disentangling the effects of shape and viewpoint changes.
  • Previous research suggests independent processing of shape and viewpoint information, but empirical evidence is mixed.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the differential impact of shape changes versus view changes on visual detection tasks.
  • To determine if observers can selectively attend to shape or view information when the other is irrelevant.

Main Methods:

  • Three picture-matching experiments were conducted.
  • Experiment 1 & 2: Assessed the effect of view changes on shape change detection.
  • Experiment 3: Assessed the effect of shape changes on view change detection.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Both shape and view changes significantly affected performance in all experiments.
  • Task-relevant changes had a greater impact than task-irrelevant changes.
  • Observers were more influenced by shape changes when detecting shape changes, and by view changes when detecting view changes.

Conclusions:

  • Human observers can discriminate between the effects of shape and view changes, indicating some level of independent processing.
  • The findings challenge the notion of completely independent estimation of shape and viewpoint, as irrelevant changes did cause disruption.
  • Observers demonstrated moderate success in disregarding task-irrelevant visual variations, highlighting attentional modulation in perception.