Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Lumbar microdiscectomy under epidural anesthesia: a comparison study.

Elias C Papadopoulos1, Federico P Girardi, Andrew Sama

  • 1Spine Surgery, Spine Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY 10021, USA.

The Spine Journal : Official Journal of the North American Spine Society
|August 29, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Epidural anesthesia for lumbar microdiscectomy resulted in less postoperative nausea and vomiting compared to general anesthesia. This preliminary study suggests epidural anesthesia may be a safer alternative for this common surgical procedure.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Streamlining the MRI-Derived Vertebral Bone Quality Score for Preoperative Osteoporosis and Osteopenia Screening.

Global spine journal·2026
Same authorSame journal

Diagnostic Value of Upright-Supine Imaging and Its Association with Postoperative Outcomes in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis - A Two-Year PROM Based Comparison with Flexion Extension Radiographs.

The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society·2026
Same author

What are the Optimal Age Thresholds for qCT-based Osteoporosis and Osteopenia Screening in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Fusion Surgery?

Spine·2026
Same author

GLP-1 Agonist Use Is Not Associated With a Reduction of Paraspinal Muscle Quality in Diabetic Patients With Low Back Pain: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery·2026
Same author

Effects of Topical Steroids on Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Stand-Alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Cureus·2026
Same author

Multimodal Imaging Predictors of FEA-Derived Lumbar Vertebral Compression Strength.

Spine·2026

Area of Science:

  • Neurosurgery
  • Anesthesiology
  • Spinal Surgery

Background:

  • General anesthesia for lumbar microdiscectomy is linked to perioperative risks like nausea, vomiting, and delayed recovery.
  • Epidural anesthesia presents a potential alternative with fewer anticipated complications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of epidural anesthesia versus general anesthesia for elective lumbar microdiscectomy.
  • To compare postoperative morbidities and recovery between the two anesthetic techniques.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective study involving 43 patients undergoing lumbar microdiscectomy.
  • Two cohorts: 43 patients in an observational group and 17 in a randomized trial comparing epidural and general anesthesia.
  • Outcomes included postoperative pain, anesthesia-related complications, and recovery metrics.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • No significant differences were found in surgical time, pain levels, hospital stay, or early mobilization between epidural and general anesthesia groups.
  • Patients receiving epidural anesthesia experienced significantly less postoperative nausea and vomiting.
  • No major cardiopulmonary complications were observed in either anesthetic group.

Conclusions:

  • Epidural anesthesia demonstrates a benefit by reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting in lumbar microdiscectomy patients.
  • The study is preliminary due to a small sample size, indicating potential for minor complication differences.