Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Induction and Analysis of Oxidative Stress in Sleeping Beauty Transposon-Transfected Human Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells
Published on: December 11, 2020
Biochemical activity of reactive oxygen species scavengers do not predict retinal ganglion cell survival
Christopher R Schlieve1, Christopher J Lieven, Leonard A Levin
1Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, Wisconsin 53792, USA.
Purpose:
Retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) die as a result of axonal injury in a variety of optic neuropathies, including glaucoma. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) act as intracellular signaling molecules and initiate apoptosis in nerve growth factor-deprived sympathetic neurons and axotomized RGCs. Determination of the role of specific ROS relies on the use of small molecule or protein scavengers with various degrees of specificity. The pro- or anti-cell-death effect of several ROS generating and scavenging systems in cultured RGCs was correlated with their activity in cell-free assays.
Methods:
Neonatal rat retinas were dissociated and incubated with ROS-generating systems for hydroxyl radical, superoxide anion (O2-), and H2O2. Scavengers tested were catalase, polyethylene glycol-superoxide dismutase (PEG-SOD), manganese (III) tetrakis(1-methyl-4-pyridyl)porphyrin (MnTMPyP), 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox), deferoxamine, and U-74389G. Viability of retrogradely labeled RGCs was determined with calcein-AM 24 hours after plating. O2- and H2O2 scavenging in cell-free assays was measured with dihydroethidium and Amplex Red (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), respectively.
Results:
Systematic differences were found between ROS scavenging in cell-free assays and the ability of scavengers to protect RGCs in cell culture. Furthermore, many ROS scavengers lost specificity and protected against various ROS, whereas others failed to protect against their unique ROS target. These activities stray from commonly recognized specificities of individual ROS scavengers or generating systems and are important in understanding ROS biology. In addition, antioxidant defense mechanisms used by RGCs and other retinal cells interfere with responses expected from ROS scavengers in well-defined systems. Last, H2O2 induced intramitochondrial O2-, whereas paraquat produced O2- outside of the mitochondria, and these areas of generation can mislead interpretations of ROS scavenger activity and effectiveness.
Conclusions:
There is discordance between ROS effects in cultured RGCs and cell-free assays, with several mechanisms accounting for this divergence. To identify the roles of ROS signaling in cell death accurately, several approaches should be used. These include using a panel of ROS scavengers and generators, testing the panel in primary neuronal cultures, and quantifying ROS with cell-free assays.
Insights
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) play a role in retinal ganglion cell (RGC) death. Scavenger effectiveness in cell-free assays does not accurately predict protection in cultured RGCs, highlighting complex biological interactions.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cell Biology
- Biochemistry
Background:
- Retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) are vulnerable to cell death following axonal injury, a hallmark of optic neuropathies like glaucoma.
- Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are implicated in initiating apoptosis in neurons, including axotomized RGCs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the role of specific ROS in RGC death by correlating the effects of ROS scavengers in cultured RGCs with their activity in cell-free assays.
- To understand the discrepancies between in vitro and cell-based ROS scavenging activities.
Main Methods:
- Primary RGC cultures were treated with various ROS-generating systems and scavengers.
- RGC viability was assessed using calcein-AM staining.
- ROS scavenging activity was quantified in cell-free assays using dihydroethidium and Amplex Red.
Main Results:
- Significant differences were observed between ROS scavenging in cell-free systems and protection of RGCs in culture.
- Many ROS scavengers exhibited altered specificity in the cellular environment, protecting against unintended ROS.
- Endogenous antioxidant mechanisms within retinal cells interfered with the expected efficacy of ROS scavengers.
Conclusions:
- The effectiveness of ROS scavengers in cell-free assays does not reliably predict their function in protecting RGCs.
- Discordance arises from altered scavenger specificity and endogenous antioxidant defenses.
- Accurate assessment requires a multi-pronged approach, including testing scavengers in primary neuronal cultures and employing cell-free ROS quantification.
More Related Videos
14:25Quantification of Reactive Oxygen Species Using 2′,7′-Dichlorofluorescein Diacetate Probe and Flow-Cytometry in Müller Glial Cells
Published on: May 13, 2022
09:16Real-Time Analysis of Bioenergetics in Primary Human Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells Using High-Resolution Respirometry
Published on: February 3, 2023