Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cues for masked amplitude-modulation detection.

Paul C Nelson1, Laurel H Carney

  • 1Department of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering, Institute for Sensory Research, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13244, USA.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|August 31, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A computational model of the mammalian auditory periphery with a closed-loop medial olivocochlear reflex simulating across-channel efferent gain control.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same author

Timbre Encoding in the Inferior Colliculus.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026
Same author

Modeling auditory enhancement: Efferent control of cochlear gain can explain level dependence and effects of hearing loss.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same author

Modelling Auditory Enhancement: Efferent Control of Cochlear Gain can Explain Level Dependence and Effects of Hearing Loss.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Duration effects on detection cues in simultaneous masking: Analysis using decision variable correlationa).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2025
Same author

Chirp sensitivity and vowel coding in the inferior colliculus.

Hearing research·2025

This study investigated how listeners detect amplitude modulation under masking. Findings reveal that simple models of auditory processing do not fully explain performance, suggesting more complex, nonlinear mechanisms are involved in auditory perception.

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Signal Processing

Background:

  • Psychoacoustic models predict listener performance via preprocessing and decision variable generation.
  • Understanding decision variables is crucial for masked auditory detection tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify perceptually relevant decision variables in masked amplitude-modulation detection.
  • To investigate the impact of masker modulation depth variation on auditory perception.

Main Methods:

  • Systematically varied masker modulation depth.
  • Introduced unreliability in potential cues by roving modulation depth.
  • Reduced cue salience by equalizing envelope energy.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Listener performance significantly degraded with varied masker depth compared to baseline.
  • Simple long-term envelope power-spectrum models partially explained results.
  • Steep threshold changes and noise-enhanced performance were not predicted by basic envelope models.

Conclusions:

  • Standard psychoacoustic models fall short in predicting performance in complex masking scenarios.
  • A physiologically based model incorporating nonlinear mechanisms may better explain observed auditory perception.
  • Further research into nonlinear auditory processing is warranted for accurate psychoacoustic modeling.