Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Using discrete choice experiments within a cost-benefit analysis framework: some considerations.

Emma McIntosh1

  • 1Department of Public Health, Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. emma.mcintosh@dphpc.ox.ac.uk

Pharmacoeconomics
|September 1, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Twenty years of marine systematic conservation planning: a global scoping review for good practices.

PeerJ·2026
Same author

Impact of later trading hours for bars and clubs on alcohol-related ambulance call-outs and crimes in Scotland: a controlled interrupted time series study.

BMJ public health·2026
Same author

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a 9 week multi-component cycling programme versus an existing single cycling training session: protocol for the Cycle Nation Communities randomised controlled trial.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

How are bars and nightclubs in Scotland using extensions in late-night alcohol trading hours? Venue observation study.

The International journal on drug policy·2026
Same author

How do musculoskeletal disorders impact on quality of life in Tanzania? Results from a community-based survey.

BMJ open·2025
Same author

A pilot randomised controlled trial of the Tailored Intervention for people with moderate-to-severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Co-morbidities delivered by Pharmacists and Consultant respiratory Physicians (TICC-PCP).

NPJ primary care respiratory medicine·2025

This study explores using stated preference discrete choice experiments (SPDCE) for cost-benefit analyses (CBA) in healthcare. It highlights challenges and offers suggestions for integrating SPDCEs into healthcare economic evaluations.

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Stated Preference Discrete Choice Experiments (SPDCE) offer flexibility in cost-benefit analyses (CBA).
  • Despite increased SPDCE use in healthcare, their application in healthcare CBAs remains limited.
  • There is a need to bridge the gap between SPDCE methodology and healthcare CBA practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline practical considerations for developing healthcare CBAs using SPDCE-derived benefits.
  • To identify challenges and suggest advancements for SPDCE-based CBA in healthcare.
  • To demonstrate how SPDCE-derived CBA can incorporate modern cost-effectiveness methods.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on SPDCEs and CBAs in healthcare.
  • Discussion of methodological integration, including cost-effectiveness plane and uncertainty analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Identification of key areas for future development in SPDCE-based healthcare CBAs.

    • Main Results:

    • SPDCE-derived CBAs can integrate cost-effectiveness plane, uncertainty analysis, and net-benefit frameworks.
    • A 'cost-benefit plane' is proposed as a tool for reporting CBA results.
    • Key challenges include accounting for uncertainty, clinical trial integration, measurement issues, and healthcare dynamics.

    Conclusions:

    • Advancing CBA methodology in healthcare requires addressing uncertainty, clinical trial integration, and measurement issues.
    • The dynamic nature of healthcare impacts the validity of attribute definitions in SPDCEs.
    • Further research is needed to fully leverage SPDCEs for robust healthcare CBAs.