Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Blood samples with hemolysis: clinical consequences?].

Mads Nybo1, Henriette Roed Nielsen, Annebirthe Bo Hansen

  • 1Odense Universitetshospital, Afdeling KKA, Klinisk Biokemi, Odense C. mads.nybo@ouh.fyns-amt.dk

Ugeskrift for Laeger
|September 1, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Interference and misleading blood test results].

Ugeskrift for laeger·2026
Same author

Stability of whole blood samples at different temperatures: a systematic review.

Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany)·2026
Same author

Recommendation on quality assurance of pneumatic transportation systems an opinion paper from the Nordic preanalytical scientific working group.

Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation·2026
Same author

[Present and future use of point-of-care testing].

Ugeskrift for laeger·2026
Same author

Performance, Safety, and Patient Experience of an Autonomous Robotic Phlebotomy Device: A Multicenter Trial.

Clinical chemistry·2026
Same author

Comparison of six serum analyte workflows using routine liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods at multiple laboratories with the Cobas i 601 analyzer, an automated mass spectrometry system.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026

Distinguishing in vitro hemolysis from in vivo hemolysis is crucial for patient treatment. This review explores methods to help clinicians and clinical biochemists differentiate hemolysis sources for improved patient care.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Biochemistry
  • Laboratory Medicine
  • Patient Diagnostics

Background:

  • Hemolysis significantly impacts biochemical analysis results.
  • Pronounced hemolysis often leads to autoreplies, masking critical diagnostic information.
  • Differentiating sampling-related (in vitro) from patient-related (in vivo) hemolysis is essential for accurate diagnosis and treatment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the benefits of collaboration between clinicians and clinical biochemists.
  • To suggest procedures for differentiating in vitro from in vivo hemolysis.
  • To address the current lack of consensus in distinguishing hemolysis origins.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature and clinical practices.
  • Analysis of diagnostic challenges posed by hemolysis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Proposal of collaborative strategies and differentiation procedures.

    • Main Results:

    • Clinical surveillance remains necessary for hemolysis assessment.
    • Improved communication between clinicians and clinical biochemists is beneficial.
    • Specific procedures can aid in differentiating hemolysis types.

    Conclusions:

    • Differentiating hemolysis origin (in vitro vs. in vivo) is critical for appropriate patient management.
    • Enhanced dialogue and standardized procedures are needed.
    • Future efforts should focus on improving interdisciplinary communication for accurate diagnostic interpretation.