Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2026

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
Enhanced inflammatory response following coronary stent implantation in stable angina patients
Carlos V Serrano1, Elise S Santos, José A Mangione
1Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo, Medical School, Brazil. carlos.serrano@incor.usp.br
Insights
Patients with lipid-rich plaques experienced a greater inflammatory response after coronary stent implantation compared to those with calcified plaques. This finding highlights the importance of plaque morphology in predicting post-PCI inflammation.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Inflammation Research
Background:
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) increases inflammatory activity.
- The relationship between post-PCI inflammation and plaque morphology is not well understood.
- Characterizing this inflammatory response based on plaque type is crucial for understanding outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between plaque morphology and the inflammatory response following coronary stent implantation (CSI).
- To compare the inflammatory mediator levels in patients with different plaque types before and after CSI.
Main Methods:
- Sixty-two stable angina patients undergoing elective CSI were included.
- Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) classified plaques as calcified (C), fibrocalcified (FC), fibrolipidic (FL), or lipidic (L).
- Coronary sinus samples measured inflammatory mediators (IL-6, TNF, IFN, neopterin) at baseline and 15 minutes post-CSI.
Main Results:
- Lipidic (L) and fibrolipidic (FL) plaques showed significantly higher increases in IL-6, TNF, IFN, and neopterin post-CSI compared to baseline.
- Calcified (C) and fibrocalcified (FC) plaques exhibited a less pronounced inflammatory response.
- Specific plaque types (B1, B2) also showed differential inflammatory changes, particularly for IL-6 and IFN.
Conclusions:
- Stable angina patients with lipidic (L, FL) plaques demonstrate a more substantial inflammatory response after CSI than those with calcified (C, FC) plaques.
- Plaque morphology is a significant determinant of the acute inflammatory reaction to coronary stent implantation.
- These findings may inform risk stratification and treatment strategies post-PCI.
Background:
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with an increase in inflammatory activity. However, little is known about the association between the inflammatory response post-PCI and plaque morphology. The objective of this study was to characterize the inflammatory response following coronary stent implantation (CSI) of stable atherosclerotic plaques, according to plaque morphology.
Methods:
The study population consisted of 62 patients with stable angina that had an elective indication of CSI. Immediately before CSI, the patients underwent intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) for determination of the predominant plaque morphology of the target lesion: calcified (C, n=15), fibrocalcified (FC, n=16), fibrolipidic (FL, n=16), or lipidic (L, n=15). Angiographic lesion types were also determined. Coronary sinus samples were collected at baseline (BL) and 15 min after CSI for measuring inflammatory mediators (IM): interleukin-6 (IL-6, in pg/ml), tumoral necrosis factor-alpha (TNF, in pg/ml), interferon-gamma (IFN, in IU/ml), and neopterin (N, in ng/ml).
Results:
BL IL-6, TNF, IFN, and N were, respectively, for C plaques (mean+/-S.D.): 1.3+/-3.0, 8.0+/-3.5, 0.1+/-0.2, and 3.2+/-0.8; for FC plaques: 6.7+/-3.3, 1.9+/-2.0, 0.1+/-0.1, and 3.8+/-2.0; for FL plaques: 0.7+/-0.9, 8.7+/-4.3, 0.1+/-0.2, and 4.0+/-2.4; and, for L plaques: 1.9+/-2.8, 0.9+/-1.4, 0.0+/-0.1, and 5.2+/-3.3. After 15 min of CSI, percentual changes of IL-6, TNF, IFN, and N, respectively, were for C plaques: 43.8+/-19.6%, 7.7+/-5.5%, -7.5+/-5.3%, and -20.0+/-11.2%; for FC plaques: 7.7+/-5.5%, 168.4+/-56.9%, 311.1+/-159.9%, and 0%; for FL plaques: 147.5+/-16.1%*, 714.3+/-34.4%*, 116.1+/-9.9%*, and 3000.0+/-230.0%*; and, for L plaques: 147.7+/-14.4%*, 140.3+/-15.0%*, 131.6+/-11.9%*, and 2300.0+/-25.9%*. Moreover, B1 (n=28) and B2 (n=32) predominated and resulted in significant changes only for IL-6 and IFN, respectively. *P<0.05: 15 min vs BL.
Conclusions:
These data suggest that stable angina patients with predominant lipidic (L and FL) plaques present a greater inflammatory response after CSI in than those with predominant calcified (C and FC) plaques.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Angina IV: Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Angina V: Nursing Management
Angina II: Classification
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations