Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2026

Injections of Lipopolysaccharide into Mice to Mimic Entrance of Microbial-derived Products After Intestinal Barrier Breach
Published on: May 2, 2018
IL-1beta and LPS induce anorexia by distinct mechanisms differentially dependent on microsomal prostaglandin E
Louise Elander1, Linda Engström, Martin Hallbeck
1Division of Cell Biology, Department of Biomedicine and Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, S-58185 Linköping, Sweden.
Abstract:
Recent work demonstrated that the febrile response to peripheral immune stimulation with proinflammatory cytokine IL-1beta or bacterial wall lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is mediated by induced synthesis of prostaglandin E(2) by the terminal enzyme microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1 (mPGES-1). The present study examined whether a similar mechanism might also mediate the anorexia induced by these inflammatory agents. Transgenic mice with a deletion of the Ptges gene, which encodes mPGES-1, and wild-type controls were injected intraperitoneally with IL-1beta, LPS, or saline. Mice were free fed, and food intake was continuously monitored with an automated system for 12 h. Body weight was recorded every 24 h for 4 days. The IL-1beta induced anorexia in wild-type but not knock-out mice, and so it was almost completely dependent on mPGES-1. In contrast, LPS induced anorexia of the same magnitude in both phenotypes, and hence it was independent of mPGES-1. However, when the mice were prestarved for 22 h, LPS induced anorexia and concomitant body weight loss in the knock-out animals that was attenuated compared with the wild-type controls. These data suggest that IL-1beta and LPS induce anorexia by distinct immune-to-brain signaling pathways and that the anorexia induced by LPS is mediated by a mechanism different from the fever induced by LPS. However, nutritional state and/or motivational factors also seem to influence the pathways for immune signaling to the brain. Furthermore, both IL-1beta and LPS caused reduced meal size but not meal frequency, suggesting that both agents exerted an anhedonic effect during these experimental conditions.
Related Concept Videos
Regulation of Food Intake
GPCRs Regulate Adenylyl Cylase Activity
Two...
IP3/DAG Signaling Pathway