Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2026

12:10
Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
Published on: May 19, 2022
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in obese patients
Judd Boczko1, Ralph Madeb, Dragan Golijanin
1University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Urology, Rochester, NY, USA.
The Canadian Journal of Urology
|September 6, 2006
Summary
Obesity does not increase complications or negatively impact oncological and functional outcomes for robot-assisted extraperitoneal prostatectomy (RAP). This study found no significant differences between obese and non-obese patients undergoing RAP.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Robotic Surgery
- Oncology
Background:
- Increasing patient weight and mild obesity present potential challenges for robot-assisted extraperitoneal prostatectomy (RAP).
- Limited data exists on the impact of obesity on RAP outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of obesity on outcomes in patients undergoing robot-assisted extraperitoneal prostatectomy (RAP).
Main Methods:
- A retrospective review of 375 consecutive RAP cases performed by a single surgeon.
- Patients were stratified by body mass index (BMI) >/= 30 kg/m2 (obese) versus < 30 kg/m2 (non-obese).
- Key outcomes compared included operative time, blood loss, oncological results (PSA, pathology, margins), complications, and functional outcomes (continence).
Main Results:
- Sixty-seven obese patients were identified and compared to non-obese patients.
- No statistically significant differences were observed in operative time, estimated blood loss, specimen weight, or complication rates.
- Oncological outcomes, including positive margin rates (12% obese vs. 15% non-obese), and 6-month continence rates (92% obese vs. 97% non-obese) showed no significant differences.
Conclusions:
- The extraperitoneal approach for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is safe and effective in obese patients.
- Obesity is not associated with increased morbidity or compromised oncological and functional outcomes in RAP.