Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Make the first move: how infants learn about self-propelled objects.

David H Rakison1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. rakison@andrew.cmu.edu

Developmental Psychology
|September 7, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Associative learning or Bayesian inference? Revisiting backwards blocking reasoning in adults.

Cognition·2023
Same author

When correlation equals causation: A behavioral and computational account of second-order correlation learning in children.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2020
Same author

Attention to Multiple Cues During Spontaneous Object Labeling.

Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies·2020
Same author

Understanding Early Categorization: One Process or Two?

Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies·2020
Same author

When a Rose Is Just a Rose: The Illusion of Taxonomies in Infant Categorization.

Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies·2020
Same author

Second-Order Correlation Learning of Dynamic Stimuli: Evidence from Infants and Computational Modeling.

Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies·2020
Same journal

Dimensionalities of home science environment and family science capital and their relationship to science achievement: Evidence from a large-scale study in Chinese adolescents.

Developmental psychology·2026
Same journal

The frequency of childhood gender-nonconforming behavior in a nationally representative sample.

Developmental psychology·2026
Same journal

Linking childhood adversity and daily hassles to adolescent sleep behaviors: Diurnal cortisol as a mediating pathway.

Developmental psychology·2026
Same journal

Infants' expectations about caregivers' comforting behavior and associations with maternal depressive symptoms at 6, 9, and 12 months.

Developmental psychology·2026
Same journal

Nonsymbolic ratio and fraction magnitude processing predict fraction knowledge in early grades.

Developmental psychology·2026
Same journal

The growing influence of the parental monitoring-peer affiliation pathway in early adolescence.

Developmental psychology·2026
See all related articles

Infants learn about object motion differently by age. Younger infants struggle to link object parts to motion, while older infants show developing, constrained understanding of self-propelled objects.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Development
  • Infant Perception
  • Object Learning

Background:

  • Early learning involves understanding object properties and motion.
  • Infants' ability to discern causal relationships in object interactions develops over time.
  • Investigating how infants attend to dynamic versus static object features is crucial for understanding early concept acquisition.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine how 16- to 20-month-old infants attend to dynamic and static parts of objects.
  • To investigate infants' learning about self-propelled objects based on object part properties.
  • To understand the developmental trajectory of encoding motion properties in early childhood.

Main Methods:

  • Habituation experiments were conducted with 16- to 20-month-old infants.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Infants were exposed to events involving geometric figures with moving or static parts.
  • Testing involved switching object parts to assess infants' encoding of motion-related relations.

    • Main Results:

    • 16-month-olds did not consistently link an object's part to its onset of motion.
    • 18-month-olds demonstrated unconstrained encoding of self-propulsion relations.
    • 20-month-olds showed constrained encoding of relations involving self-propelled motion.

    Conclusions:

    • Infants' understanding of motion properties evolves significantly between 16 and 20 months.
    • Early concept acquisition involves developmental changes in how infants process object-motion relationships.
    • Attention to dynamic versus static parts plays a key role in infants' learning about object propulsion.