Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the $2,000...
Heuristics01:21

Heuristics

Heuristics are problem-solving strategies that use mental shortcuts to simplify decision-making. Unlike algorithms, which must be followed precisely to achieve a correct result, heuristics offer a general problem-solving framework. They save time and energy but can sometimes lead to less rational decisions.
People often rely on heuristics when faced with an overload of information, limited time, low importance of the decision, limited information, or when a heuristic readily comes to mind. For...
Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Experimental manipulation of ecological and cognitive conditions produces the entire conformity-diversity spectrum in a single species.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Complex dynamics of social learning in groups of wild Arabian babblers.

Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology·2025
Same author

Predicting human decisions with behavioural theories and machine learning.

Nature human behaviour·2025
Same author

Evolution of diverse (and advanced) cognitive abilities through adaptive fine-tuning of learning and chunking mechanisms.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2025
Same author

Social demonstration of colour preference improves the learning of associated demonstrated actions.

Animal cognition·2024
Same author

Conformity and Group Performance.

Human nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.)·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 20, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

Risk attitude in small timesaving decisions.

Nira Munichor1, Ido Erev, Arnon Lotem

  • 1Max Wertheimer Minerva Center for Cognitive Studies, Behavioral Sciences, Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Management, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied
|September 7, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Decision-makers' risk attitudes in saving time mirror those in saving money, with increased risk aversion observed as experience grows. Difficulty ranking delays can lead to random choices.

More Related Videos

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 20, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Decision Science
  • Behavioral Economics
  • Cognitive Psychology

Background:

  • Individuals often rely on personal experience when making decisions under time constraints.
  • Understanding risk preferences in time-related decisions is crucial for behavioral modeling.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how decision-makers' risk attitudes in time-saving contexts compare to those in monetary contexts.
  • To identify factors influencing risk-taking behavior when minimizing delays.
  • To explore the impact of experience on risk aversion in time-based decisions.

Main Methods:

  • Four experiments were conducted involving decision-makers facing time-saving choices.
  • Participants' choices between risky and safer options with equivalent expected values were analyzed.
  • Experimental conditions manipulated the ease of comparing delays and the presence of actions during delays.

Main Results:

  • Risk attitudes in time-saving decisions closely resemble those in experience-based monetary decisions.
  • A tendency towards random choice emerged when ranking delays proved difficult.
  • Increased similarity to monetary decisions and heightened risk aversion were observed when actions were taken during delays, particularly with growing experience.

Conclusions:

  • Personal experience significantly shapes risk preferences in both time and monetary decisions.
  • The ability to clearly compare options is critical for non-random decision-making.
  • Experience appears to foster greater risk aversion in time-saving scenarios, aligning with economic decision-making principles.