Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic versus open Burch colposuspension: a randomised controlled trial.

M P Carey1, J T Goh, A Rosamilia

  • 1Department of Urogynaecology at Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. mcarey@netlink.com.au

BJOG : an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
|September 8, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Exploration of key stakeholder views and experience of specialist schools' food: a qualitative study.

BMC public health·2026
Same author

Impact of social franchising on TB contact investigation and uptake of TB preventive therapy.

Public health action·2025
Same author

Finding missing TB cases in Northern Nigeria.

Public health action·2025
Same author

Comparative analysis of the impact of portable digital X-ray on TB screening in hard-to-reach areas in Nigeria.

Public health action·2025
Same author

Appraising perception, accessibility and uptake of DAT among patients with TB.

Public health action·2024
Same author

Perception, acceptability and challenges of digital adherence technology among TB healthcare workers.

Public health action·2024

Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension (LBC) offers advantages over open Burch colposuspension (OBC) for urinary stress incontinence. Both methods show similar long-term success rates, but LBC leads to less pain and faster recovery.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Female Pelvic Medicine

Background:

  • Urinary stress incontinence (USI) significantly impacts women's quality of life.
  • Surgical interventions like Burch colposuspension are common treatments for USI.
  • Comparing laparoscopic and open approaches is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare perioperative outcomes, short-term, and long-term results of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension (LBC) versus open Burch colposuspension (OBC).
  • To evaluate cure rates, patient satisfaction, and recovery metrics for both surgical techniques.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized surgical trial with single blinding was conducted across three tertiary hospitals.
  • Two hundred women with urodynamic stress incontinence (USI) were enrolled.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Outcomes included absence of USI at 6 months, postoperative pain, hospital stay, and return to daily activities, adjusted for surgeon experience.

    • Main Results:

    • No significant differences in cure rates or patient satisfaction were observed between LBC and OBC at 6 months, 24 months, or 3-5 years.
    • LBC procedures took longer (87 vs. 42 minutes) but resulted in less blood loss, reduced pain, and quicker return to normal activities compared to OBC.

    Conclusions:

    • Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension (LBC) presents significant advantages over traditional open Burch colposuspension (OBC).
    • LBC offers improved perioperative recovery without compromising short-term or long-term efficacy for treating urinary stress incontinence.