Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2026

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Is there a role for antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with implantable defibrillators?
Andrew Ho1, Ramin Assadi, Sudha M Pai
1Section of Cardiology, University of Southern California/Keck School of Medicine, 1510 San Pablo Street, #322,Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
Insights
Empiric antiarrhythmic drug use in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) is not recommended due to potential side effects, device interactions, and unclear survival benefits. Current evidence does not support its routine use in ICD patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are preferred over antiarrhythmic drugs for preventing arrhythmic deaths.
- Antiarrhythmics are still commonly used with ICDs to manage shocks from ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias.
- The efficacy and safety of empiric antiarrhythmic therapy in ICD patients are not well-established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the role and impact of empiric antiarrhythmic drug use in patients with ICDs.
- To assess the risks, benefits, and survival effects of concomitant antiarrhythmic therapy in ICD recipients.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing clinical data and randomized trials concerning antiarrhythmic drug use in ICD patients.
- Analysis of potential side effects and drug-device interactions associated with antiarrhythmic therapy in this population.
Main Results:
- Conflicting data exists from small trials regarding the benefits of empiric antiarrhythmic therapy.
- Antiarrhythmic drugs can cause serious side effects and may interfere with ICD function.
- The impact of these drugs on survival in ICD patients is not clearly characterized.
Conclusions:
- Empiric antiarrhythmic therapy in patients with ICDs is not recommended at this time.
- Lack of convincing clinical data, potential side effects, and drug-device interactions support this conclusion.
Abstract:
With remarkable advancement in technology and clinical research, implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have replaced antiarrhythmic drugs as the preferred modality for both primary and secondary prevention of arrhythmic deaths. However, concomitant use of antiarrhythmics in patients with ICDs remains common, often for prevention or reduction of appropriate and inappropriate shocks caused by ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias, respectively. The role of empiric antiarrhythmic therapy in this patient population remains less clearly defined, with conflicting information from various small randomized trials. Use of antiarrhythmic drugs in the ICD patient population not only can cause potentially serious side effects but can also interact or interfere with the ICD device function. In addition, the effect on survival in patients with ICDs is not well characterized. Given the many potential side effects, drug-device interactions, unclear survival effect, and lack of convincing clinical data supporting its use, empiric antiarrhythmic therapy in the ICD patient population cannot be recommended at this time.
Related Concept Videos
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class III Agents as Potassium Channel Blockers
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class I Agents as Sodium Channel Blockers
Class 1A Antiarrhythmic Drugs: These drugs work by moderately blocking sodium channels,...
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class IV Agents as Calcium Channel Blockers
Verapamil, a calcium channel blocker, inhibits calcium movement across myocardial cell membranes and vascular smooth muscle. This results in the dilation of coronary and...
