Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Informing patients about small risks: A comparative approach.

A J G M Janssen1

  • 1Academic Medical Center/University of Amsterdam.

European Journal of Health Law
|September 9, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Do guidelines on euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in Dutch hospitals and nursing homes reflect the law? A content analysis.

Journal of medical ethics·2011
Same journal

Comparative Legal Analysis of German and Austrian Constitutional Court Decisions on the Criminal Liability of Assisting Suicide.

European journal of health law·2026
Same journal

Addressing De Facto Discrimination through the European Health Data Space: Taking Obesity as a Case Study of Non-Immediate Primary Use.

European journal of health law·2026
Same journal

From Margins to Movement: Young Scholars, Digital Health, and the Future of EU Health Law.

European journal of health law·2026
Same journal

Conceptualising European Union Health Law.

European journal of health law·2026
Same journal

European Court of Human Rights.

European journal of health law·2026
Same journal

Balancing Care: Human Rights Perspectives on Family Caregivers in Long-Term Care.

European journal of health law·2026
See all related articles

Informed consent laws vary significantly regarding patient risk disclosure. This comparative legal analysis highlights key differences between the Netherlands, the UK, and Germany for medical treatment.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Law
  • Bioethics
  • Patient Rights

Background:

  • Informed consent is a cornerstone of ethical medical practice.
  • Determining the extent of risk disclosure for patient consent remains a complex legal and ethical issue.
  • International variations in legal standards necessitate comparative analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the legal frameworks governing patient information on treatment risks in the Netherlands, the UK, and Germany.
  • To analyze the extent to which patients must be informed about potential risks during the consent process.
  • To identify potential areas for legal harmonization or divergence in medical consent law.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative legal analysis of national legislation and case law.
  • Review of scholarly articles and legal commentaries from the Netherlands, UK, and Germany.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of relevant international legal principles and guidelines.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant differences exist in the threshold for disclosing treatment risks across the three jurisdictions.
    • The Netherlands appears to have a more patient-centered approach compared to the UK and Germany.
    • Specific legal tests and judicial interpretations shape the scope of required disclosure in each country.

    Conclusions:

    • The legal standards for informing patients about treatment risks are not uniform across Europe.
    • Understanding these differences is crucial for healthcare providers and patients engaged in cross-border medical care.
    • Further research could explore the practical implications of these legal variations on patient outcomes and autonomy.