Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Aggregation, defence and warning signals: the evolutionary relationship.

Graeme D Ruxton1, Thomas N Sherratt

  • 1Division of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, Institute of Biomedical and Life Sceinces, Graham Kerr Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK. g.ruxton@bio.gla.ac.uk

Proceedings. Biological Sciences
|September 9, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pink Cricket Club: Dramatic color change in a Neotropical leaf-masquerading katydid (Arota festae, Griffini, 1896).

Ecology·2026
Same author

Hidden colour signals as key drivers in the evolution of anti-predator coloration and defensive behaviours in snakes.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Similar Survival Rates of Territorial and Sneaker Males in a Polymorphic Damselfly: A Multi-Year Study.

Ecology and evolution·2025
Same author

Evolutionary influences of sexual signalling on protective colouration.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2025
Same author

Functional and evolutionary synergy of trait components can explain the existence of leaf masquerade in katydids.

PLoS biology·2025
Same author

Zebra stripes: the questions raised by the answers.

Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society·2025

Prey defense mechanisms likely evolved before group living and warning signals. While both can influence each other, defense is generally the initial evolutionary step for aggregated, defended species.

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Behavioral Ecology
  • Predator-Prey Dynamics

Background:

  • Fisher's hypothesis proposed distastefulness evolves in family groups.
  • Many defended prey species aggregate, raising questions about the order of defense and aggregation evolution.
  • Contemporary theory suggests a reciprocal relationship between defense and gregariousness.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To elucidate the evolutionary ordering of defense and aggregation in prey species.
  • To investigate whether aggregation facilitates defense evolution or vice versa.
  • To reconcile theoretical predictions with empirical evidence on the co-evolution of defense and group living.

Main Methods:

  • Review of theoretical frameworks on the evolution of defense and gregariousness.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of existing phylogenetic and experimental studies.
  • Consideration of the conditions under which conspicuous signaling evolves.

    • Main Results:

    • Phylogenetic analyses are limited by the rarity of gregarious species.
    • Experimental studies show that both orderings (defense first or aggregation first) are possible.
    • Undefended aggregated prey are vulnerable without satiation effects; conspicuous signals require defense.

    Conclusions:

    • Defense most likely preceded the evolution of both aggregation and signaling in most prey species.
    • Alternative evolutionary pathways where aggregation or signaling evolve first are possible.
    • The interplay between defense, aggregation, and signaling is complex and context-dependent.