Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

New perspectives on assessing amplification effects.

Pamela E Souza1, Kelly L Tremblay

  • 1Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98105, USA. psouza@u.washington.edu

Trends in Amplification
|September 9, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Own-Voice Perception with Different Processing Delays in Open-Fit Hearing Aids.

Trends in hearing·2026
Same author

Developing Topics.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025
Same author

The Effects of Signal to Noise Ratio, T60 , Wide-Dynamic Range Compression Speed, and Digital Noise Reduction in a Virtual Restaurant Setting.

Ear and hearing·2024
Same author

Cognitive and linguistic abilities and perceptual restoration of missing speech: Evidence from online assessment.

Frontiers in psychology·2022
Same author

The role of working memory in speech recognition by hearing-impaired older listeners: does the task matter?

International journal of audiology·2022
Same author

Older adults' perceptions of current and future hearing healthcare services in Australia, England, US and Canada.

Public health research & practice·2021
Same journal

From the editor.

Trends in amplification·2014
Same journal

From the editor.

Trends in amplification·2014
Same journal

From the editor.

Trends in amplification·2014
Same journal

From the editor.

Trends in amplification·2014
Same journal

From the editor.

Trends in amplification·2014
Same journal

From the editor.

Trends in amplification·2014
See all related articles

Hearing aid performance varies, even with proper fitting. This review introduces a framework and new assessment methods to understand hearing aid effects on speech understanding, aiding clinicians in identifying issues.

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Hearing Science
  • Speech Processing

Background:

  • Hearing aid users often experience variable speech understanding despite appropriate selection and fitting.
  • Understanding the factors influencing hearing aid effectiveness is crucial for improving patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a multistage framework for analyzing hearing aid performance.
  • To introduce and discuss two novel assessment techniques for evaluating hearing aid function and user perception.

Main Methods:

  • A six-stage framework detailing the hearing aid performance pathway from signal to perception.
  • Acoustic analysis of speech output from hearing aids.
  • Auditory evoked potential (AEP) measurements in hearing aid users.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The framework integrates signal acoustics, hearing aid modification, ear interaction, auditory system integrity, cue coding, and speech sound identification.
  • Acoustic analysis methods assess speech signal quality and processing effects.
  • AEPs provide physiologic insights into speech processing with hearing aids.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed framework offers a comprehensive approach to understanding hearing aid performance variability.
  • New assessment techniques, including acoustic analysis and AEPs, show clinical utility for evaluating hearing aid effectiveness and identifying user-specific challenges.