Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2026

Continuous Venous-Arterial Doppler Ultrasound During a Preload Challenge
Published on: January 20, 2023
Variability in the establishment of an external reference point for central venous pressure measurement in children
Aline S C Belela1, Mavilde L G Pedreira, Maria Angélica S Peterlini
1Cuidados Intensivos Pediátricos, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Insights
Healthcare workers show significant variability in identifying the midaxillary line for central venous pressure measurement in children. Experienced professionals may underestimate this reference point, potentially impacting patient safety.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric critical care medicine
- Medical measurement techniques
- Patient safety protocols
Background:
- Accurate central venous pressure (CVP) measurement is crucial for pediatric intensive care.
- The midaxillary line is a commonly used external reference point (ERP) for CVP measurement.
- Variability in ERP establishment can affect measurement accuracy and clinical decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the variability in establishing the midaxillary line as an ERP for CVP measurement in children.
- To compare measurements made by different healthcare professionals against a trained evaluator.
- To identify factors influencing the variability of ERP establishment.
Main Methods:
- A descriptive and correlational study was conducted in a pediatric intensive care unit.
- 120 assessments of the midaxillary line were performed by 44 healthcare workers (nurses, physicians, assistants) and a trained evaluator.
- Data were analyzed using chi-square, ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, and t-tests.
Main Results:
- Significant differences (p < 0.001) were found between healthcare workers' and the evaluator's ERP assessments.
- 46.7% of measurements were lower, 36.7% higher, and 16.7% concordant with the evaluator's.
- Neither professional category (p = 0.899) nor experience level influenced concordance, but greater experience correlated with sharper deviations.
Conclusions:
- The midaxillary line as an ERP for CVP measurement shows considerable variability among healthcare teams.
- Variability is not linked to professional category.
- Increased experience may lead to underestimation of the ERP, potentially compromising procedure efficacy and patient safety.
Objective:
To investigate the variability in the establishment of the midaxillary line as external reference point (ERP), by different healthcare workers, for the measurement of central venous pressure in children.
Methods:
Descriptive and correlational study carried out in a pediatric intensive care unit of a teaching hospital. During the establishment of the midaxillary line as ERP for central venous pressure measurement, five assessments of the same patient made by healthcare workers and one assessment made by a trained evaluator were compared. A total of 120 assessments were made by 44 healthcare workers, 17 (38.6%) by nursing assistants and nursing technicians, 16 (36.3%) by nurses and 11 (25.1%) by physicians, in addition to 24 assessments made by the trained evaluator. The data were analyzed using the chi-square test, ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis test and t test. Significance level was set at 5%.
Results:
There was statistically significant difference between the assessments made by healthcare workers and by the evaluator (p < 0.001). The comparison of the variability in the measurements made by healthcare workers revealed that 56 (46.7%) measurements were lower than those obtained by the evaluator (range from -0.5 to -9), 44 (36.7%) were higher (range from 0.5 to 4) and 20 (16.7%) were concordant (zero variability). Professional category did not influence the concordance between the ERPs (p = 0.899), or the variability observed (p = 0.778). However, the measurements made by professionals with greater experience in intensive care tended to differ more sharply from those made by the evaluators.
Conclusion:
The indications of the midaxillary line as ERP presented variations when measured by the healthcare team and by the trained evaluator. Variability was not influenced by professional category, and the more experienced the healthcare worker, the greater the probability for underestimation of the ERP. According to the results of this study, such situations may compromise both the efficacy of this procedure and patient safety.
Related Concept Videos
Sites for measuring blood pressure
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Temperature Measurement Sites
Oral: When assessing oral temperature, the thermometer tip should be placed under the tongue in the posterior sublingual pocket. It offers accurate readings and can be...
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Equipments Used To Measure Blood Pressure
This invasive approach involves cannulating a peripheral artery. During each cardiac contraction, pressure generates mechanical motion within the catheter, transmitted through rigid, fluid-filled tubing to a transducer. This transducer converts mechanical motion into electrical signals displayed as waveforms on a monitor. An automatic flushing system prevents blood backflow. Due to the potential risk of unexpected arterial blood loss, this method is primarily used in intensive...
Measurement of Blood Pressure