Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Estimating background and threshold nitrate concentrations using probability graphs.

S V Panno1, W R Kelly, A T Martinsek

  • 1Illinois State Geological Survey, 615 East Peabody Drive, Champaign, IL 61820, USA. panno@isgs.uiuc.edu

Ground Water
|September 12, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Feasibility of Applying a Stable Isotopic Tracer for Direct Determination of Dry Particulate Deposition to Soybean Plants.

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)·2017
Same author

Characterizing pharmaceutical, personal care product, and hormone contamination in a karst aquifer of southwestern Illinois, USA, using water quality and stream flow parameters.

The Science of the total environment·2016
Same author

Elemental analysis of a single-wall carbon nanotube candidate reference material.

Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry·2010
Same author

Some considerations in applying background concentrations to ground water studies.

Ground water·2008
Same author

The necropsy and veterinary practice.

Australian veterinary journal·2007
Same author

Characterization and identification of na-cl sources in ground water.

Ground water·2006
Same journal

Computing Flow-Field Distortion Coefficients from Well-Construction and Formation Properties.

Ground water·2026
Same journal

Leaky Sewers Hydraulically Disconnect from Groundwater: A Proof-of-Concept.

Ground water·2026
Same journal

Python-Based Model Emulation Workflows with PEST.

Ground water·2026
Same journal

Hydrogeology in the Age of AI and Climate Change.

Ground water·2026
Same journal

Aquifer Thermal Energy Storage: Groundwater for Efficient Data Center Cooling in the United States.

Ground water·2026
Same journal

Simulating the Impacts of Deep Geothermal Development on Shallow Hydrothermal Resources in a Rocky Mountain Rift Valley.

Ground water·2026
See all related articles

Determining natural nitrate (NO3-) background levels in groundwater is challenging due to widespread human pollution. This study uses statistical thresholds to differentiate between natural and anthropogenic nitrogen sources in karst aquifers.

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Hydrogeology
  • Water Quality Analysis

Background:

  • Anthropogenic nitrate (NO3-) is pervasive globally, making natural background concentration determination difficult.
  • Current background groundwater NO3- must account for diffuse sources like soil disruption, organic matter oxidation, and atmospheric deposition.
  • Nitrogen (N) inputs from synthetic fertilizers, livestock waste, and septic systems are significant anthropogenic sources.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish threshold concentrations for differentiating background and anomalous nitrate (NO3-N) levels in karst aquifers.
  • To identify the primary sources of nitrogen contamination in spring and well water samples.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized cumulative probability graphs to analyze 232 spring water and 200 well water samples.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Identified distinct threshold concentrations for NO3-N in both spring and well water.
  • Interpreted thresholds to distinguish between precipitation, background, fertilizer, and livestock waste N sources.

    • Main Results:

    • Established spring water thresholds at 0.4, 2.5, and 6.7 mg/L, and well water thresholds at 0.1, 2.1, and 17 mg/L.
    • Identified 2.5 and 2.1 mg/L as present-day background NO3-N concentrations for spring and well water, respectively.
    • Higher concentrations (>6.7 mg/L in springs, >15 mg/L in wells) were linked to synthetic fertilizer and livestock waste, respectively.

    Conclusions:

    • Statistical thresholds effectively differentiate anthropogenic nitrogen sources in karst groundwater.
    • The methodology provides a framework for assessing groundwater quality and identifying pollution origins.
    • Understanding these thresholds is crucial for managing nitrogen pollution and protecting water resources.