Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Statistical methods for the validation of questionnaires--discrepancy between theory and practice.

M E Schmidt1, K Steindorf

  • 1Unit of Environmental Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.

Methods of Information in Medicine
|September 12, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

TROPHIT1-a randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase II/III trial of sacituzumab govitecan compared to standard of care in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

ESMO gastrointestinal oncology·2026
Same author

Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars.

Nature·2025
Same author

Fe-phosphates in Jezero Crater as evidence for an ancient habitable environment on Mars.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

The role of physical activity, sedentary behaviour, diet, adiposity and body composition on health-related quality of life and cancer-related fatigue after diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a Global Cancer Update Programme (CUP Global) systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

ESMO open·2025
Same author

Aqueously altered igneous rocks sampled on the floor of Jezero crater, Mars.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2022
Same author

An olivine cumulate outcrop on the floor of Jezero crater, Mars.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2022
Same journal

Design and methodological development of a digital clinical safety training programme informed by a national framework: a New Zealand case study.

Methods of information in medicine·2026
Same journal

Panic Prediction from Digital Phenotyping: Subject-Level Cross-Validation Reveals Limited Between-Person Generalization.

Methods of information in medicine·2026
Same journal

Agent-Based Modeling Approach for Population Dynamics of the Biological Vector Aedes Aegypti.

Methods of information in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Statistical Framework for Person-centered Analysis of Digital Service Use in Public Health and Social Care.

Methods of information in medicine·2026
Same journal

Assessing the Quality of Electronic Discharge Summaries: A Cross-Sectional Study Using the Validated Spanish Version of the PDQI-9.

Methods of information in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Knowledge Graph-Driven Hypergeometric Efficacy Prediction Model for Classical Traditional Chinese Herbal Formulas.

Methods of information in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Correlation coefficients in questionnaire validation studies can be misleading. Bland-Altman methods offer a superior approach for assessing bias and improving the quality of epidemiological data.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Health Sciences

Background:

  • Questionnaire validation is crucial for reliable epidemiological studies.
  • Current statistical methods and their interpretation in validation studies lack clarity.
  • Traditional methods like correlation coefficients are widely used but criticized.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the theory and practice of statistical evaluation methods for questionnaire validation.
  • To compare the effectiveness of correlation coefficients versus Bland-Altman methods.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature review of physical activity questionnaires.
  • Computer simulations to test statistical approaches.
  • A validation study conducted by the researchers.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Correlation coefficients were used in 89.1% of reviewed publications, despite being criticized for over 20 years.
  • Bland-Altman methods, recommended for appropriate evaluation, were found in only 21.7% of studies.
  • Bland-Altman plots effectively reveal questionnaire bias missed by correlation coefficients.
  • Simulations confirmed correlation coefficients do not adequately assess subject ranking.
  • Bland-Altman analyses identified differential errors related to case-control status, unlike correlation coefficients.

Conclusions:

  • The prevalent use of correlation coefficients in validation studies can lead to erroneous conclusions.
  • Widespread adoption and correct application of Bland-Altman methods are essential for enhancing epidemiological data quality.