Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2026

Surgical Placement of Catheters for Long-term Cardiovascular Exercise Testing in Swine
Published on: February 9, 2016
Capacity planning for cardiac catheterization: a case study
Diwakar Gupta1, Madhu Kailash Natarajan, Amiram Gafni
1Graduate Program in Industrial & Systems Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. guptad@me.umn.edu
Insights
Healthcare capacity planning is complex. Computer simulation models using patient flow data can accurately predict needs, optimize scheduling, and reduce cardiac catheterization waiting times for all urgency levels.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Operations Research
- Cardiology
Background:
- Excessive waiting times for procedures like cardiac catheterization are a significant healthcare system challenge.
- Delays stem from a mismatch between patient demand and available resources, further complicated by dynamic referral rates, procedure durations, and patient urgency.
- Accurate prediction of capacity needs has been difficult due to these dynamic factors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To demonstrate a method for accurately calculating healthcare capacity needs.
- To utilize computer simulation to model patient flow and predict waiting times for cardiac procedures.
- To identify strategies for minimizing patient waiting times in cardiac catheterization labs.
Main Methods:
- A patient flow model was developed and populated with 16 months of operational data from a regional cardiac center (n=6215 referrals).
- Computer simulation was employed to analyze various "what-if" scenarios for catheterization laboratory operations.
- Patients were categorized into three urgency levels: hospitalized (U1), urgent outpatients (U2), and elective outpatients (U3). Model accuracy was validated against actual data, showing a significant correlation (0.94).
Main Results:
- Simulation revealed that simply increasing capacity to clear backlogs did not effectively reduce waiting times.
- Targeting additional capacity to higher urgency categories (U1, U2) reduced overall waiting times and also benefited lower urgency patients (U3).
- Improving lab efficiency can be achieved by reducing changeover times, standardizing pre- and post-procedural management, and optimizing booking schedules to minimize slack and overtime.
Conclusions:
- Capacity determination is a complex, dynamic process requiring a blend of clinical and administrative data.
- Computer simulation models are essential tools for predicting capacity needs and effectively managing waiting lists.
- This simulation approach is generalizable and can optimize waiting list management for various medical procedures.
Background:
Excessive waiting for procedures such as cardiac catheterization is an important issue for health care systems. Delays are generally attributed to a mismatch between demand and available capacity. Furthermore, due to the dynamic nature of short-term referral rates, procedure times, and patients' medical urgency, all of which are important contributors to the problem of excessive waiting time, it has been difficult to predict capacity needs accurately. The objective of our paper is to demonstrate how such calculations could be performed.
Methods:
After constructing a patient flow model and populating it with appropriate data from 16 consecutive months of operations (n=6215 referrals) of a regional cardiac centre in Ontario, we used computer simulation to simulate the operations of catheterization laboratories in several "what-if" scenarios. We divided the patients into three urgency categories: U1--hospitalized patients, U2--urgent outpatients, U3--elective outpatients. We tested the accuracy of the model by comparing a 1-year sample of computer simulation with actual data which resulted in a highly significant correlation of 0.94.
Results:
We observed from the referral cohort that waiting times were long, both overall and within each urgency category. We observed from the simulation models that: (1) a one-time infusion of capacity to clear the backlog failed to reduce the waiting times; (2) targeting extra capacity to highest urgency categories reduced waiting times overall and also benefited low urgency patients for whom specific increased capacity was not earmarked; (3) there were no significant effects on waiting times if in some cases patients or referring physicians were able to choose their cath physician; and (4) in situations where the arrival rates increased overall or within specific urgency categories, waiting times increased dramatically and failed to return to baseline for several months to years for the low urgency patients. Efficiency of the labs within the existing capacity could be improved by: (1) reducing changeover time between cases (2) externalizing and standardizing many of the pre- and post-procedural management of the patients, and (3) more carefully balancing the booking to reduce both slack and overtime.
Interpretation:
Capacity determination is a complex and dynamic process. A combination of available clinical and administrative data, along with a computer simulation model, helps predict capacity needs and is the most appropriate strategy to minimize waiting of patients for procedures. This approach is generalizable and can lead to more effective management of waiting lists for a variety of procedures.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care

