Continuous cerebral and myocardial perfusion during aortic arch repair in neonates and infants

Yasuhiro Kotani1, Kozo Ishino, Shingo Kasahara

  • 1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine and Dentistry, Okayama, Japan.

ASAIO Journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992)
|September 13, 2006
PubMed

Insights

Minimizing myocardial ischemia during aortic arch repair in infants is crucial. Both non-working beating heart and working beating heart techniques offer effective strategies for complex congenital heart defect repair, ensuring high survival rates.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Cardiac Surgery
  • Congenital Heart Defects
  • Cardiovascular Perfusion

Background:

  • Aortic arch obstruction combined with ventricular septal defects presents complex surgical challenges.
  • Minimizing myocardial ischemia during repair is critical for infant outcomes.
  • Cerebral and myocardial perfusion strategies are vital for protecting the infant heart during surgery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare two distinct perfusion techniques for minimizing myocardial ischemia during aortic arch repair in infants with ventricular septal defects.
  • To evaluate the efficacy and safety of non-working beating heart (NWBH) versus working beating heart (WBH) techniques.
  • To assess the impact of these techniques on surgical outcomes and survival rates.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 71 infants undergoing primary repair of coarctation of the aorta or interruption of the aortic arch with ventricular septal defect.
  • Comparison of end-to-end arch anastomosis using NWBH (n=65) with cerebral/myocardial perfusion via innominate/ascending cannula versus WBH (n=6) with innominate artery cannulation and cross-clamping.
  • Detailed assessment of myocardial ischemia, need for cardioplegic arrest, and procedural success.

Main Results:

  • The working beating heart (WBH) technique successfully completed extended arch anastomoses without myocardial ischemia in all 6 patients.
  • Ten patients (15%) undergoing the non-working beating heart (NWBH) technique required cardioplegic arrest for anastomosis.
  • Overall survival was high at 98%, with one hospital death and one late death.

Conclusions:

  • End-to-end arch reconstruction is feasible and can be achieved without myocardial ischemia.
  • The NWBH technique is suitable for patients without hypoplastic arches.
  • The WBH technique is advantageous for patients with hypoplastic arches, ensuring myocardial protection.