Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2026

Ultrasonographic Assessment During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Published on: October 24, 2020
Blind subxiphoid pericardiotomy for cardiac tamponade because of acute hemopericardium
Yoshihiko Kurimoto1, Mamoru Hase, Satoshi Nara
1Department of Traumatology and Critical Care Medicine, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan. kurimoto@sapmed.ac.jp
Insights
Blind subxiphoid pericardiotomy (BSP) is a safe and rapid emergency procedure for hemopericardium, outperforming percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) which risks complications like clotting and catheter occlusion.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Emergency Medicine
- Surgical Procedures
Background:
- Hemopericardium can lead to cardiac tamponade, a life-threatening condition.
- Percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) for hemopericardium has limitations, including potential catheter occlusion and cardiac perforation.
- Rapid intervention is crucial in emergency cases of cardiac tamponade due to hemopericardium.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of blind subxiphoid pericardiotomy (BSP) as an emergency procedure for hemopericardium.
- To compare BSP with percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) in managing cardiac tamponade secondary to various causes.
- To determine a favorable management strategy for hemopericardium-induced cardiac tamponade.
Main Methods:
- A prospective control study was conducted comparing BSP (n=16) and PCD (n=67) for cardiac tamponade from hemopericardium.
- Patients presented with cardio-pulmonary arrest (CPA) or near CPA due to trauma, acute aortic dissection, or myocardial infarction.
- BSP was performed by board-certified surgeons, while PCD was managed by emergency physicians, with or without local anesthesia.
Main Results:
- Blind subxiphoid pericardiotomy (BSP) was effective in all cases, whereas PCD failed in five cases due to pericardial clotting.
- The BSP group experienced no complications, contrasting with five critical and three infeasible drainage complications in the PCD group.
- Survival rates were comparable between groups (4/16 in BSP vs. 6/67 in PCD), though BSP showed a trend towards better outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Blind subxiphoid pericardiotomy (BSP) is a safe, rapid, and effective emergency procedure for hemopericardium.
- Percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) is associated with significant complications, particularly due to pericardial clotting.
- BSP offers a valuable alternative for immediate management of cardiac tamponade in emergency settings.
Objective:
Percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) is not always effective in a case of hemopericardium. Acute occlusion of catheter and cardiac perforation can happen more often. To perform subxiphoid pericardiotomy within a minute for emergency cases, we have done this procedure in a blind method after finger dissection by subxiphoid approach. We report the usefulness of blind subxiphoid pericardiotomy (BSP) based on the results of a prospective control study.
Methods:
We designed a study to determine a favorable management for cardiac tamponade resulting from hemopericardium. In an emergency case of cardiac tamponade because of hemopericardium, board certified surgeons should perform BSP and other emergency physicians should perform PCD, with or without local anesthesia. PCD (n = 67) and BSP (n = 16) were performed for patients with cardio-pulmonary arrest (CPA) or near CPA because of cardiac tamponade secondary to trauma (n = 7), acute aortic dissection (n = 65), and cardiac rupture following acute myocardial infarction (n = 11) in our emergency medical center from January 2000 to December 2004.
Results:
BSP was effective in all cases but PCD was ineffective in five cases because of clotting in pericardium (p = 0.260). No complication was observed in the BSP group but five critical complications and three infeasible drainage complications were observed in the PCD group (p = 0.146). Ten patients (BSP, 4; PCD, 6; p = 0.077) survived after emergency surgery (n = 8) or conservative treatment (n = 2).
Conclusion:
BSP was safe and could be performed quickly in an emergency situation. Percutaneous catheter drainage for hemopericardium could not avoid critical complications because of clotting in pericardium.
Related Concept Videos
Pericarditis III: Medical Management
Pericarditis IV: Nursing Management
